This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Is Preoperative Sphincterotomy Necessary?

Edward H. Phillips, MD; Mark Liberman, MD; Brendan J. Carroll, MD; Moses J. Fallas, MD; Raul J. Rosenthal, MD; Jonathan R. Hiatt, MD

Arch Surg. 1995;130(8):880-886.

Abstract
Objective
To evaluate treatments for common bile duct stones (CBDS).

Design
Retrospective review of authors' case series.

Setting
Large private metropolitan teaching hospital.

Patients
All patients with CBDS (N=145) from a series of 1231 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 99% with intraoperative fluorocholangiography.

Interventions
Treatments for CBDS included one or more of the following: laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration (n=123), laparoscopic choledochotomy (n=10), open choledochotomy (n=7), preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) (n=9), intraoperative ES (n=2), postoperative ES (n=11), or observation (n=10).

Main Outcome Measures
Success of various interventions for CBDS, morbidity and mortality, frequency of retained stones, operative time, and length of postoperative hospitalization.

Results
Laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration was successful in 91% of attempts and resulted in the shortest postoperative stay (3.4 days), least morbidity (5%), and fewest retained stones (5%). Endoscopic sphincterotomy was successful in 56% of preoperative attempts, 50% of intraoperative attempts, and 91% of postoperative attempts. There were no reoperations and one death.

Conclusions
For patients requiring cholecystectomy, laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration is safe and effective, treats CBDS in one session, and if unsuccessful still allows for open choledochotomy or postoperative ES. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and ES should be reserved for patients with serious illness or possible malignant disease.

(Arch Surg. 1995;130:880-886)

Author Affiliations
From the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (Drs Phillips, Liberman, Carroll, Fallas, Rosenthal, and Hiatt), and the Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine (Dr Hiatt).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Cost Analysis of the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones Discovered During . Cholecystectomy
Traverso
SURG INNOV 2000;7:302-307.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography in the Management of Bile Duct Stones
Demartines et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:148-152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Abnormal Intraoperative Cholangiography: Treatment Options and Long-term Follow-up
Kondylis et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:347-350.
ABSTRACT  

Safe Laparoendoscopic Approach to Biliary Pancreatitis in Older Patients
McGrath et al.
Arch Surg 1996;131:826-833.
ABSTRACT