You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 9, September 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Thoracoscopy vs Conventional Autopsy of the Thorax

A Promising Perspective

Ram Avrahami, MD; Shalom Watemberg, MD; Yuda Hiss, MD

Arch Surg. 1995;130(9):956-958.


Abstract

Objective
To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of thoracoscopic autopsy compared with that of conventional postmortem examination.

Design
Consecutive sampling, case-series study.

Setting
A general community referral center and the local Institute of Forensic Medicine.

Participants
A consecutive sample of 20 fresh cadavers (less than 24 hours old), victims of motor vehicle crashes, gunshot wounds, in-hospital deaths.

Interventions
Introduction of the thoracoscope through the fourth or fifth intercostal space, anterior or midaxillary line. The pleural cavity and mediastinum were examined. Formal postmortem examination was then performed, and the findings of both procedures were recorded, compared, and analyzed.

Main Outcome Measures
Prior to the beginning of the study, it was hypothesized that thoracoscopic autopsy would reach an overall sensitivity and specificity of at least 85% and enable accurate inspection of the thoracic cavity and mediastinum in search of traumarelated abnormalities in trauma victims or cause of death in in-hospital patients.

Results
There was an 85% correlation of both procedures in all cases. The sensitivity of thoracoscopic autopsy was 87% and overall specificity reached 72%.

Conclusions
Thoracoscopic autopsy is accurate and easy to perform. It is highly sensitive, especially in deaths due to trauma and following thoracic surgery. Thoracoscopic autopsy is an important tool that allows the diagnosis of major chest abnormalities as well as ruling out postoperative catastrophe, information that is invaluable for the surgeon, as well as all the medical staff and families. Thoracoscopic postmortem examination should be offered to mourning families as a cosmetic and reliable option when informed consent for conventional autopsy is lacking.

(Arch Surg. 1995;130:956-958)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery B, Belinson Medical Center, Petah Tiqwa (Drs Avrahami and Watemberg), and The Institute of Forensic Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University (Dr Hiss), Israel.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Investigating perinatal death: a review of the options when autopsy consent is refused
Wright and Lee
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F285-F288.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Autopsy Consent Practice at US Teaching Hospitals: Results of a National Survey
Rosenbaum et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:374-380.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.