You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 1, January 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in critically ill patients with perforated viscus. Predictive value of APACHE severity scoring

P. S. Barie, L. J. Hydo and E. Fischer
Department of Surgery, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether scoring on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III at admission can predict the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and mortality in critically ill surgical patients. DESIGN: Prospective, inception-cohort study. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of an urban, tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred fourteen critically ill patients with surgically treated perforated gastrointestinal viscus. INTERVENTIONS: Calculation of APACHE II and APACHE III scores 24 hours after admission to the surgical intensive care unit and serial quantitation of organ dysfunction for the duration of critical care according to two different predefined scoring systems. Patients were stratified by survival, the development of organ dysfunction, and colon vs noncolonic perforation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital mortality, length of stay in the surgical intensive care unit, and the development of organ dysfunction or overt organ failure. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SEM) APACHE II and APACHE III scores were 17.4 +/- 0.6 (range, 6 to 37) and 59.0 +/- 2.2 (range, 15 to 141), respectively. The incidence of organ dysfunction was 73% (64% in survivors). All severity scores were identical for colon perforation and noncolonic perforation subgroups. Nonsurvivors invariably had organ dysfunction. Overall length of stay in the intensive care unit was 12.0 +/- 1.6 days (8.7 +/- 1.2 days for survivors and 22.7 +/- 5.0 days for nonsurvivors). The APACHE scores and organ dysfunction or failure scores were significantly higher in nonsurvivors, and APACHE scores were higher in survivors with organ dysfunction than in those without it. Significant linear relationships were identified for APACHE II vs APACHE III scores (R2 = .66) and for all four combinations of APACHE scores and organ dysfunction or failure scores (R2 = .43 to .52). By multivariate analysis of variance, independent predictors of organ dysfunction or failure were APACHE III, increased age, and a prolonged stay in the surgical intensive care unit, but not the type of perforation. Neither APACHE II or APACHE III predicted mortality independently. CONCLUSIONS: The development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome correlated with higher APACHE III scores but was independent of the type of perforation. Only the development of overt multiple organ failure predicted death. Combined use of APACHE III and the multiple organ dysfunction score provides improved prediction of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, but further enhancements are needed before prediction of outcome in individual patients is reliable.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quantifying Risk and Benchmarking Performance in the Adult Intensive Care Unit
Higgins
J Intensive Care Med 2007;22:141-156.
ABSTRACT  

Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) in Sepsis: Initial Experience With Patient Selection, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes
Higgins et al.
J Intensive Care Med 2005;20:291-297.
ABSTRACT  

Risk Stratification in Emergency Surgical Patients: Is the APACHE II Score a Reliable Marker of Physiological Impairment?
Koperna et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:55-59.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gender-Based Differences in Outcome in Patients With Sepsis
Eachempati et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:1342-1347.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.