 |
 |

Expression of p53 Protein in Colorectal Carcinoids
Jhy-Young Cheng, MD, PhD;
Lai-Fa Sheu, MD;
Ching-Liang Meng, MD, PhD;
Jih-Chang Lin, MD
Arch Surg. 1996;131(1):67-70.
Abstract
 |  |
Objective To determine the frequency and prognostic significance of p53 protein expression in colorectal carcinoid tumors.
Design Thirty-one paraffin-embedded specimens of colorectal carcinoid tumor were studied by immunohistochemical staining to detect p53 protein expression. The association of p53 expression with tumor site, tumor size, invasion level, tumor stage, DNA pattern, and patient survival were analyzed.
Results p53 protein was detected in five (16%) of 31 colorectal carcinoid tumors. There was a correlation between p53 overexpression and tumor site, tumor size, tumor stage, and DNA ploidy (P<.05) but not for the depth of tumor invasion (P=.06). In addition to tumor size, invasion, stage, and DNA aneuploidy, p53 protein overexpression was also indicative of a poor prognosis (P<.001).
Conclusions The overexpression of p53 protein is uncommon in colorectal carcinoid tumors. However, the expression of p53 protein has a correlation with clinicopathologic-predicting criteria in colorectal carcinoid tumors and may be used as an associated prognostic parameter to assess patient survival.
(Arch Surg. 1996;131:67-70)
Author Affiliations
From the Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Departments of Surgery (Drs Cheng and Lin), Pathology (Dr Sheu), and Medical Research (Dr Meng), Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Loss of Nuclear p27 Expression and Its Prognostic Role in Relation to Cyclin E and p53 Mutation in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Grabowski et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:7378-7384.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Gastrin releasing peptide and gastrin releasing peptide receptor expression in gastrointestinal carcinoid tumours
Scott et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2004;57:189-192.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|