You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 10, October 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prognostic Value of the Monoethylglycinexylidide Liver Function Test in Assessing Donor Liver Suitability

Ralph Fairchild, MD; Harvey Solomon, MD; John Contis, PhD, MD; Donald Kaminski, MD

Arch Surg. 1996;131(10):1099-1102.


Abstract

Background
Liver graft assessment prior to transplantation continues to be controversial. Various donor organ parameters must be evaluated to ensure that the transplanted organ will function and that the number of organs discarded will be minimized. Recent attempts to quantify liver function have utilized the metabolism of lidocaine to monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX), and the MEGX test has been employed to evaluate the functional characteristics of donor livers prior to transplantation, with conflicting results.

Objective
To ascertain the role of quantitating the metabolic rate of lidocaine in predicting the results of liver transplantation.

Methods
Consecutive liver donors (N=37) underwent quantitation of the amount of lidocaine converted to MEGX at 15 minutes. The donor patients were divided arbitrarily into efficient and poor lidocaine metabolizers, and the results of liver transplantation were evaluated.

Results
Patients who received livers that produced MEGX values of 80 ng/mL or less in 15 minutes had no definable alteration in transplantation outcome compared with patients who received livers that were more efficient lidocaine metabolizers. In a collected series, 46 patients who received livers that produced MEGX values of 80 ng/mL or less had a 1-month graft survival rate of 89% (41/46), while 74 patients who received livers that produced MEGX values greater than 80 ng/mL had a 1-month graft survival rate of 86% (64/74).

Conclusions
The MEGX test had no practical utility in predicting liver graft functional status.

Arch Surg. 1996;131:1099-1102



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, St Louis University Hospital, St Louis, Mo. Dr Fairchild is now with the Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, New England Medical Center, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessment of liver function: pre- and peritransplant evaluation
Shaked et al.
Clin. Chem. 1997;43:1539-1545.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.