You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 11, November 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (51)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Management of Intra-abdominal Infections

The Case for Intraoperative Cultures and Comprehensive Broad-spectrum Antibiotic Coverage

N. V. Christou, MD, PhD; P. Turgeon, MD; R. Wassef, MD; O. Rotstein, MD; J. Bohnen, MD; M. Potvin, MD

Arch Surg. 1996;131(11):1193-1201.


Abstract

Objective
To test the hypothesis that comprehensive broad-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy is superior to limited-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy in intra-abdominal infections.

Design
Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

Setting
University-affiliated hospitals in Canada.

Patients
Two hundred thirteen patients with intra-abdominal infections and planned operative or percutaneous drainage.

Intervention
Limited-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy consisted of cefoxitin sodium, 2 g, intravenously, every 6 hours (n=109). Comprehensive broad-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy consisted of a combination of imipenem and cilastatin sodium, 500 mg, intravenously, every 6 hours (n=104).

Main Outcome Measures
Failure to cure the intra-abdominal infection (persistence of infection or death).

Results
Of initial isolates, 98% were sensitive to imipenem plus cilastin sodium compared with 72% for cefoxitin. No difference was found in the failure rate between treatment groups. Among various reasons for failure (including technical), 12 of 80 patients in the limited-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy group had resistant organisms at a second intervention compared with 1 of 74 in the comprehensive broad-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy group (P<.003, {chi}2). One death in the limited-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy group was due to autopsy-proved disseminated Pseudomonas aeruginosa (blood, peritoneum, lung, and pleural fluid) that was resistant to cefoxitin, and the other was associated with peritonitis due to cefoxitin-resistant Enterobacter cloacae. One death in the comprehensive broad-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy group was associated with peritonitis from Clostridium perfringens that was sensitive to imipenem plus cilastin sodium, and the other was associated with peritonitis from Pseudomonas aeruginosa that was resistant to imipenem plus cilastin sodium.

Conclusion
Treatment failure of intra-abdominal infection may be due, in part, to the presence of resistant pathogens at the site of infection. Therefore, routine culture of these sites seems worthwhile and empirical therapy should be as comprehensive as possible and should cover all potential pathogens.

Arch Surg. 1996;131:1193-1201



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery and Microbiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec (Dr Christou); the Division of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (Dr Turgeon) and the Department of Surgery (Dr Wassef), Hôpital Saint-Luc, Universitè de Montréal; the Departments of Surgery, Toronto Hospital (Dr Rotstein) and Wellesley Hospital (Dr Bohnen) and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Drs Rotstein and Bohnen); and the Department of Surgery, Hôpital Laval, Ste-Foy, Québec (Dr Potvin). Members of the Canadian Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group are listed at the end of the article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical and microbiological profiles of community-acquired and nosocomial intra-abdominal infections: results of the French prospective, observational EBIIA study
Montravers et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2009;63:785-794.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Microdialysis Study of Imipenem Distribution in the Intraperitoneal Fluid of Rats with or without Experimental Peritonitis
Lefeuvre et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006;50:34-37.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology in intra-abdominal infections associated with diverticulitis
BROOK and FRAZIER
J Med Microbiol 2000;49:827-830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial Comparing Cefepime Plus Metronidazole With Imipenem-Cilastatin in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Barie et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:1294-1302.
ABSTRACT  

Host Defense Mechanisms of Surgical Patients: Friend or Foe?
Christou
Arch Surg 1996;131:1136-1140.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.