You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 2, February 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Paramedic vs Private Transportation of Trauma Patients

Effect on Outcome

Demetrios Demetriades, MD, PhD; Linda Chan, PhD; Edward Cornwell, MD; Howard Belzberg, MD; Thomas V. Berne, MD; Juan Asensio, MD; Dennis Chan, MD; Mark Eckstein, MD; Kathy Alo, RN

Arch Surg. 1996;131(2):133-138.


Abstract

Background
Prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) play a major role in any trauma system. However, there is very little information regarding the role of prehospital emergency care in trauma. To investigate this issue, we compared the outcome of severely injured patients transported by paramedics (EMS group) with the outcome of those transported by friends, relatives, bystanders, or police (non-EMS group).

Design
We compared 4856 EMS patients with 926 non-EMS patients. General linear model analysis was performed to test the hypothesis that hospital mortality is the same in EMS and non-EMS cases, controlling for the following confounding factors, which are not affected by mode of transportation: age, gender, mechanism of injury, cause of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and severe head injury. Crude, specific, and adjusted mortality rates and relative risks were also derived for the EMS and non-EMS groups.

Setting
Large, urban, academic level I trauma center.

Patients
All patients meeting the criteria for major trauma.

Results
The two groups were similar with regard to mechanism of injury and the need for surgery or intensive care unit admission. The crude mortality rate was 9.3% in the EMS group and 4.0% in the non-EMS group (relative risk, 2.32; P<.001). After adjustment for ISS, the relative risk was 1.60 (P=.002). Subgroup analysis showed that among patients with ISS greater than 15, those in the EMS group had a mortality rate twice that of those in the non-EMS group (28.8% vs 14.1%). After controlling for confounding factors, the adjusted mortality among patients with ISS greater than 15 was 28.2% for the EMS group and 17.9% for the non-EMS group (P<.001).

Conclusions
Patients with severe trauma transported by private means in this setting have better survival than those transported via the EMS system. Large prospective studies are needed to identify the factors responsible for this difference.

(Arch Surg. 1996;131:133-138)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery (Drs Demetriades, Cornwell, Belzberg, Berne, and Asensio and Ms Alo), the Division of Research/Biostatistics (Dr L. Chan), and the Department of Emergency Medicine (Drs D. Chan and Eckstein), Los Angeles County+ University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The clinical effectiveness of pre-hospital intravenous fluid replacement in trauma patients without head injury: a systematic review
Dretzke et al.
Trauma 2006;8:131-141.
ABSTRACT  

Trauma and critical care III: chest trauma
Shirley
Trauma 2005;7:133-142.
ABSTRACT  

Acute Traumatic Injuries in Rural Populations
Peek-Asa et al.
AJPH 2004;94:1689-1693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The advances and evidence base for prehospital care
MacFarlane
Emerg. Med. J. 2003;20:114-115.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of emergency medical services systems: a classification to assist in determination of indicators
MacFarlane and Benn
Emerg. Med. J. 2003;20:188-191.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fluid resuscitation in prehospital trauma care: a consensus view
Revell et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2002;19:494-498.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fluid resuscitation in pre-hospital trauma care: a consensus view
Revell et al.
Trauma 2002;4:21-28.
ABSTRACT  

Thoracolumbar Immobilization for Trauma Patients With Torso Gunshot Wounds: Is It Necessary?
Cornwell III et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:324-327.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pre-hospital fluids - when and how much?
Revell and Porter
Trauma 2000;2:179-186.
ABSTRACT  

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) vs Non-EMS Transport of Critically Injured Patients: A Prospective Evaluation
Cornwell III et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:315-319.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prehospital emergency care
Cooke et al.
BMJ 1996;313:1220-1221.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.