You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 2, February 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Racial Factors Cannot Explain Superior Japanese Outcomes in Stomach Cancer

Scott A. Hundahl, MD; Grant N. Stemmermann, MD; Andrew Oishi, MD

Arch Surg. 1996;131(2):170-175.


Abstract

Objective
To compare the stage-stratified survival of Japanese patients treated in Honolulu according to Western techniques with that of Japanese patients treated in Tokyo according to Japanese techniques, thus eliminating race as a potentially confounding variable.

Design and Patients
Of 312 Honolulu Japanese patients surviving Western-type gastric resection for neoplasm between 1974 and 1985, 279 were identified with invasive gastric adenocarcinoma unassociated with any second malignancy. This Honolulu cohort, treated by Western methods, was retrospectively compared with a similar, previously described cohort of 3176 Tokyo Japanese patients treated according to Japanese methods.

Main Outcome Measures
American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer criteria for stage-stratified survival.

Results
Despite non-TNM prognostic factors favoring higher survival for the Honolulu Japanese patients, for every TNM stage, we observed higher survival for the Tokyo Japanese patients who were treated according to Japanese techniques. For stage I disease, the survival rates were 86% vs 96%, respectively (P<.001); for stage II, 69% vs 77% (P=.15); for stage III, 21% vs 49% (P<.001); and for stage IV, 4% vs 14% (P<.001).

Conclusions
Because all patients in this study are Japanese, race-related factors or the "different-disease" hypothesis cannot explain these results. Lymphadenectomyrelated stage-migration and/or differing therapeutic efficacy seem more likely explanations.

(Arch Surg. 1996;131:170-175)



Author Affiliations

From the Queen's Medical Center and the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, Honolulu (Dr Hundahl), University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, and Kuakini Medical Center, Honolulu (Dr Stemmermann), and the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Dr Oishi).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

National Outcomes After Gastric Resection for Neoplasm
Smith et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:387-393.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Asian Ethnicity-Related Differences in Gastric Cancer Presentation and Outcome Among Patients Treated at a Canadian Cancer Center
Gill et al.
JCO 2003;21:2070-2076.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The long term results of endoscopic surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions
Whiting et al.
Gut 2002;50:378-381.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial Factors Cannot Explain Superior Japanese Outcomes in Stomach Cancer
Noguchi
Arch Surg 1997;132:99-99.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.