Prognosis and treatment of peritonitis. Do we need new scoring systems?
T. Koperna and F. Schulz
Department of General Surgery, University of Vienna, Austria.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical significance of present scoring systems
for prognosis and treatment in patients with secondary bacterial
peritonitis and to define risk factors for patient survival and outcome not
included in the scores. A secondary objective was to review our therapeutic
regimens and the need for reoperation with regard to outcome. DESIGN:
Prospective observational study. SETTING: University hospital, secondary
referral center. PATIENTS: From 1992 to 1995, 92 patients with secondary
peritonitis were examined at the University Surgical Clinic, Vienna,
Austria. the populations as a whole consisted of 56 men and 36 women with
an average age of 56 +/- 19 years. Forty-four percent of patients had
postoperative peritonitis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, multiple organ
system failure (MOSF), relaparotomy. RESULTS: The mortality rate in
patients with an APACHE II (Adult Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation)
score of less than 15 was 4.8%, while mortality rose to 46.7% in those with
a score of 15 or higher (P = .001). The average total mortality rate was
18.5%. The prognosis for patients without organ failure or with failure of
one organ system was excellent (mortality rate, 0%); quadruple organ
failure, however, had a mortality rate of 90%. Initial thrombocytopenia (
< 60 x 10(9)/L), four-quadrant peritonitis, and diabetes mellitus were
associated with significantly higher mortality. Leukopenia (white blood
cells, < 6 x 10(9)/L) and inappropriate antibiotic therapy as determined
by the antibiogram were mildly significant for higher mortality. The need
for relaparotomy resulted in substantially higher mortality (P < .001).
The impossibility of definitive operative resolution of the intra-abdominal
pathologic findings at initial operation had no significant effect on
mortality, possibly because planned reoperations were always carried out in
those cases. For patients with definitive resolution at initial operation,
it was possible to reduce the traditionally high mortality rate associated
with relaparotomy on demand by making the decision for reexploration
promptly, within the first 48 hours. Nevertheless, the 52.4% mortality rate
observed in those cases was still much higher than the 33% found in
patients who were not free of disease after the initial operation.
CONCLUSION: The prognosis in peritonitis is decisively influenced by the
health status of the patient at the beginning of treatment and by any
concomitant risk factors. As a result, a fairly accurate prediction of the
outcome of the disease can initially be made on the basis of the APACHE II
score and the MOSF score according to Goris. However, the certainty that
severely ill patients with high scores often die has little clinical
relevance, since it does not provide any therapeutic alternatives to the
attending physician. The decision to perform a relaparotomy must be made as
soon as possible, at least before MOSF emerges. Already existing MOSF will
lead to the "point of no return."
Comparison of On-Demand vs Planned Relaparotomy Strategy in Patients With Severe Peritonitis: A Randomized Trial
van Ruler et al.
JAMA 2007;298:865-872.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Timing of Reoperation for Patients With Severe Peritonitis
Dellinger
JAMA 2007;298:923-924.
FULL TEXT
Evaluation of Procalcitonin for Predicting Septic Multiorgan Failure and Overall Prognosis in Secondary Peritonitis: A Prospective, International Multicenter Study
Rau et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:134-142.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Predictive Factors of Mortality Due to Polymicrobial Peritonitis With Candida Isolation in Peritoneal Fluid in Critically Ill Patients
Dupont et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:1341-1346.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation of antimicrobial therapy management of 120 consecutive patients with secondary peritonitis
Sotto et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2002;50:569-576.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Circulating Mediators and Organ Function in Patients Undergoing Planned Relaparotomy vs Conventional Surgical Therapy in Severe Secondary Peritonitis
Zugel et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:590-599.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Tumor Necrosis Factor-Dependent Adhesions as a Major Protective Mechanism Early in Septic Peritonitis in Mice
Echtenacher et al.
Infect. Immun. 2001;69:3550-3555.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Risk Stratification in Emergency Surgical Patients: Is the APACHE II Score a Reliable Marker of Physiological Impairment?
Koperna et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:55-59.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT