This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Impact of Pretreatment Diagnosis

G. Thomas Marshall, MD; Douglas A. Howell, MD; Brian L. Hansen, MD; Steve M. Amberson, MD; Georges S. Abourjaily, MD; Carl E. Bredenberg, MD

Arch Surg. 1996;131(3):278-283.

Abstract
Objective
To determine the effectiveness of thin-section, dynamic-contrast computed tomography and angiography in detecting the presence of pancreatic pseudoaneurysms.

Design
This case series consisted of 57 patients who were being examined for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Setting
All patients were examined in a tertiary care, teaching hospital.

Patients
Fifty-seven consecutive patients were examined for 2 years. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 2 years.

Interventions
All patients underwent thin-section, high-speed, dynamic-contrast computed tomography. Those patients with findings that were consistent with the presence of a pseudoaneurysm underwent angiography. Embolization was attempted if a pseudoaneurym was present. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was used to determine pancreatic ductal anatomy before operation.

Main Outcome Measure
No undetected pseudoaneurysm has complicated this series of endoscopically drained pseudocysts.

Results
Five patients had findings that were consistent with a pancreatic pseudoaneurysm on computed tomography. Angiographic findings confirmed a pseudoaneurysm in four patients, and angiographic embolization was successful in three. Four patients underwent resection, while one was treated with embolization and endoscopic stenting of a compressed pancreatic duct. There were no mortalities.

Conclusions
Before endoscopic drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst, a thin-section, high-speed, dynamic-contrast computed tomographic scan is essential. If there are findings consistent with the development of a pseudoaneurysm, angiography must be performed. This allows delineation of the arterial anatomy, as well as the option of performing angiographic embolization. While patients with pseudoaneurysms in the body and tail of the pancreas underwent resection, angiographic embolization alone was an acceptable alternative when the lesion was located in the head of the pancreas.

(Arch Surg. 1996;131:278-283)

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Marshall, Abourjaily, and Bredenberg), Gastroenterology (Dr Howell), Medicine (Dr Hansen), and Radiology (Dr Amberson), Maine Medical Center, Portland.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis and management of complications
Church et al.
Gut 2007;56:1189-1190.
FULL TEXT  

Arterial Embolization for Bleeding Pseudocysts Complicating Chronic Pancreatitis
Gambiez et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:1016-1021.
ABSTRACT