You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 3, March 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Multimodality treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatobiliary specialty center

A. Marcos-Alvarez, R. L. Jenkins, W. K. Washburn, W. D. Lewis, K. E. Stuart, F. D. Gordon, R. A. Kane and M. E. Clouse
Division of Hepatobilaiary Surgery, Deaconess Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

OBJECTIVES: To review the experience of the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by a single multimodality team during a 6-year period, including all patients who were referred for possible surgical intervention, to evaluate prognostic factors at presentation, and to determine the results of the different modalities of treatment that were used. DESIGN: Retrospective study of 154 patients who were referred to our Hepatobiliary Surgical Unit with the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma from January 1988 through August 1995. SETTING: Tertiary care center. RESULTS: Methods of treatment included surgical resection (n=49), transplantation (n=22), hepatic artery chemoembolization (n=30), systemic chemotherapy (n=25), and no treatment (n=22). Predictive prognostic factors included coexisting cirrhosis, symptoms at presentation, and abnormal liver function test results. Unfavorable tumor characteristics were size (diameter, >5 cm) and multicentricity. For patients who underwent surgical exploration, advanced staging according to the manual of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, vascular invasion, and a margin of less than 1 cm in the group for patients who underwent resection impacted negatively on the prognosis. The median survival (42.4 months) for the group of patients who underwent resection was significantly higher than that for the groups of patients who did not undergo resection. Chemoembolization was associated with significantly better survival results than was systemic chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection offers the best chance at cure for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The high association between hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhotic liver disease makes surgical resection, even in favorable tumor types, a difficult task based on low hepatic reserve whose tumors are considered unresectable can be considered for chemoembolization. Liver transplantation should be reserved for selected patients with cirrhotic liver disease who have tumors (diameter, <5 cm) in the contest of neoadjuvant protocols.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

No-Mortality Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic and Noncirrhotic Patients: Is There a Way? A Prospective Analysis of Our Approach
Torzilli et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:984-992.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Indications and Role of Liver Transplantation for Malignant Tumors
Pichlmayr et al.
The Oncologist 1997;2:164-170.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.