You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 3, March 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Patient selection for hepatic resection of colorectal metastases

H. J. Wanebo, Q. D. Chu, M. P. Vezeridis and C. Soderberg
Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the major factors governing patient outcome after hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal cancer and to formulate criteria for optimal resection. PATIENTS: We reviewed records of 74 patients (44 men, 30 women) who underwent resection of colorectal liver metastases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sex, age, primary tumor location; Dukes tumor stage; disease-free interval after primary resection (synchronous vs metachronous); location, number, size, and distribution of liver metastases; operative complications; and mortality. RESULTS: The primary tumor location was rectosigmoid in 46 patients and the colon in the others. The tumor stage was Dukes A in one patient, Dukes B in 16, Dukes C in 31, and Dukes D (synchronous metastases) in 26. The disease-free interval was less than 12 months in 38 patients and 12 months or more in 36. The location of the metastases was the right lobe in 42 patients, left lobe in 22, and bilateral in seven. The cancer was unilobar in 55 patients and bilobar in 18. Surgical resection included wedge resection in 23 patients, segmentectomy in 30, lobectomy in seven, and trisegmentectomy in 12. The number of lesions resected was one in 50 patients, two or three in 18, and four or more in five. Nine patients had repeated liver resections because of recurrence. There were five postoperative deaths within 60 days (7%), four of which occurred after extended resection and were complicated by delayed liver failure and multisystem failure. An additional death occurred at 65 days after an apparently uneventful initial convalescence. Overall median survival was 35 months; actuarial 5- and 10-year survival rates were 24% and 12% respectively. There were significant relationships with survival (P<.05) for the number of metastases (three or fewer vs four or more), bilobar vs unilobar metastases, and extent of liver resection (wedge and segmental vs lobectomy and trisegmentectomy). A multiple logistic regression model (multivariate analysis) showed a significant correlation with survival (P<.05) for distribution of metastases (bilobar vs unilobar) and extent of resection (wedge and segmental vs lobectomy and trisegmentectomy). CONCLUSION: Patient selection for hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastases based on standard clinical and tumor outcome variables should be expected to achieve long-term survival with low morbidity and mortality in bilobar disease or extended resection should generally be avoided, especially in medically compromised patients.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Outcome After Hepatectomy for Multiple (Four or More) Colorectal Metastases in the Era of Effective Chemotherapy
Kornprat et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:1151-1160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Simplified Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Resectable Liver Metastasis: Development and Validation
Minagawa et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:269-276.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis in Resectable Synchronous and Metachronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis
Tsai et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:786-794.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastasis: Impact of Tumour Size
Hamady et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006;13:1493-1499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Clinical Risk Score: Emerging as a Reliable Preoperative Prognostic Index in Hepatectomy for Colorectal Metastases
Mann et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:1168-1172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Choice of Surveillance After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Metastases
Metcalfe et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:749-754.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Positron Emission Tomography Affects Surgical Management in Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Patients
Desai et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2003;10:59-64.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy of Fluorine-18-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Detecting Tumor Recurrence After Local Ablative Therapy for Liver Metastases: A Prospective Study
Langenhoff et al.
JCO 2002;20:4453-4458.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Mayo Clinic Experience With Multimodality Treatment of Locally Advanced or Recurrent Colon Cancer
Taylor et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2002;9:177-185.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resection of Synchronous Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
Fujita et al.
Jpn J Clin Oncol 2000;30:7-11.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR BOTH PULMONARY AND HEPATIC METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL CANCER
Kobayashi et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999;118:1090-1096.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Treatment and Other Regional Treatments for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
Yoon and Tanabe
The Oncologist 1999;4:197-208.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Additional Value of Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography With Fluorine-18-2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
Flamen et al.
JCO 1999;17:894-894.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.