You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 4, April 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Bile duct injuries, 1989-1993. A statewide experience. Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry

J. C. Russell, S. J. Walsh, A. S. Mattie and J. T. Lynch
Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Wallingford, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To review the incidence of major bile duct injuries (MBDI) during the shift from open (OC) to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). DESIGN: Cohort analysis; minimum 15-month patient follow-up. SETTING: Acute care Connecticut hospitals. PATIENTS: Medical records of 30211 patients with cholecystectomy (OC or LC) reviewed; 47 cases of MBDI confirmed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rate of MBDI. RESULTS: The incidence of MBDI in Connecticut hospitals rose from 0.04% in 1989 to 0.24% in 1991, then decreased to 0.11% in 1993. The increase was due to increased numbers of cholecystectomies and the initial increased risk of injury with LC. The 1990-through-1993 trend of decreasing incidence of LC MBDI was statistically significant (P=.02). By 1993, the difference between LC and OC was no longer significant (P=.81). Acute cholecystitis (odds ratio, 3.3) and gallstone pancreatitis (odds ratio, 3.6) increased the risk of MBDI during LC (P<.001). The LC MBDI more commonly were ductal excision or transections and often were not diagnosed intraoperatively. Intraoperative cholangiography facilitated intraoperative recognition and repair. Most patients (89%) underwent definitive management of the MBDI at the hospital of origin; of those, 5% required further interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeries for acute cholecystitis and gallstone pancreatitis are associated with an increased risk for MBDI. Ductal anatomy, the timing of recognition of injury, and the method of repair dictate patient outcomes. Most patients are successfully managed at the hospital of origin, with good long-term results. Late bile duct strictures appear rare.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
Strasberg
NEJM 2008;358:2804-2811.
FULL TEXT  

Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Results of an Italian National Survey on 56 591 Cholecystectomies
Nuzzo et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:986-992.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change
Cameron et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2004;80:292-294.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy and Survival in Medicare Beneficiaries
Flum et al.
JAMA 2003;290:2168-2173.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Operative Repair of Bile Duct Injuries Involving the Hepatic Duct Confluence
Jarnagin and Blumgart
Arch Surg 1999;134:769-775.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.