You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 4, April 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Telesurgery

Acceptability of Compressed Video for Remote Surgical Proctoring

Jonathan R. Hiatt, MD; M. Michael Shabot, MD; Edward H. Phillips, MD; Richard F. Haines, PhD; Terry L. Grant

Arch Surg. 1996;131(4):396-400.


Abstract

Objective
To determine the clinical acceptability of various levels of video compression for remote proctoring of laparoscopic surgical procedures.

Design
Observational, controlled study.

Setting
Community-based teaching hospital.

Participants
Physician and nurse observers.

Interventions
Controlled surgical video scenes were subjected to various levels of data compression for digital transmission and display and shown to participant observers.

Main Outcome Measures
Clinical acceptability of video scenes after application of video compression.

Results
Clinically acceptable video compression was achieved with a 1.25-megabit/second data rate, with the use of odd-screen 43.3:1 Joint Photographic Expert Group compression and a small screen for remote viewing.

Conclusion
With proper video compression, remote proctoring of laparoscopic procedures may be performed with standard 1.5-megabit/second telecommunication data lines and services.

(Arch Surg. 1996;131:396-400)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (Drs Hiatt, Shabot, and Phillips); Department of Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles (Drs Hiatt and Shabot); and RECOM Technologies Inc (Dr Haines) and Computational Sciences Division (Mr Grant), Ames Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Moffett Field, Calif.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Asynchronous Confirmation of Anatomical Landmarks by Optical Capture in Open Surgery
Rafiq et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:792-795.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gaze-Contingent Multiresolutional Displays: An Integrative Review
Reingold et al.
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2003;45:307-328.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnostic Medical Sonography, Interactive Video, and Distance Learning
DuBose et al.
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 1997;13:146-152.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.