You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 4, April 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

An alternative approach of choledocholithotomy via laparoscopic choledochotomy

S. M. Huang, C. W. Wu, G. Y. Chau, S. C. Jwo, W. Y. Lui and F. K. P'eng
Department of Surgery, Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy via choledochotomy for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. DESIGN: A prospective series of 1332 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomies, with a mean follow-up of 21.2 months. SETTING: University-affiliated referral center. Patients: Forty-three patients (3%) with documented common bile duct stones from January 1991 to February 1995. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy with choledochotomy and T tube drainage were performed in 40 patients. Postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in three patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Documented removal of common bile duct stones and procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy via choledochotomy was successful in 35 (88%) of 40 patients in whom this procedure was attempted. The mean (+/- SD) operation time was 191.3 +/- 75.4 minutes, and the mean (+/- SD) length of postoperative stay was 10.4 +/- 2.7 days. Seven complications (18%) were recorded, including three major complications (8%) and two retained stones (5%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy via choledochotomy can be performed safely, without increasing the morbidity rate as compared with that of open choledocholithotomy. Thus, some of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery are preserved.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.