You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 7, July 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Use of Duplex Ultrasonography in Penetrating Neck Trauma

Enrique Ginzburg, MD; Berta Montalvo, MD; Susan LeBlang, MD; Diego Nunez, MD; Larry Martin, MD

Arch Surg. 1996;131(7):691-693.


Abstract

Objective
To compare intraoperative findings and/or angiography with color-flow duplex scan.

Design
This prospective double-blind study was performed on all stable patients with zone 1, 2, or 3 penetrating neck trauma. Results of angiographic or intraoperative findings were compared with the results of duplex ultrasonographic scans.

Main Outcome Measures
Fifty-five patients were studied over a 2-year period in which the distribution of injuries included 23 stab wounds (42%), 30 gunshot wounds (54%), and 2 motor vehicular lacerations (4%). There were 42 patients (76%) with normal ultrasonographic results and 13 patients (24%) with abnormal ultrasonographic results. The true-negative rate was 100%; however, there were 2 false positives resulting in 100% sensitivity and 85% specificity.

Conclusions
Duplex ultrasonography provides an excellent diagnostic modality with cost-saving, patient-friendly characteristics and a low rate of morbidity. It should be instituted as the primary diagnostic procedure of choice for penetrating neck trauma.

Arch Surg. 1996;131:691-693



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery (Drs Ginzburg and Martin), and the Department of Radiology (Drs Montalvo, LeBlang, and Nunez), University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact of MDCT Angiography on the Use of Catheter Angiography for the Assessment of Cervical Arterial Injury After Blunt or Penetrating Trauma
Stuhlfaut et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;185:1063-1068.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Penetrating Neck Injuries: Helical CT Angiography for Initial Evaluation
Munera et al.
Radiology 2002;224:366-372.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Penetrating neck injury: a review
MacFarlane and Benn
Trauma 2002;4:79-90.
ABSTRACT  

Noninvasive Imaging of Cervical Vascular Injuries
LeBlang and Nunez
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000;174:1269-1278.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.