You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 7, July 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of Transrectal Ultrasonography to Select Type of Surgery for Villous Tumors in the Lower Two Thirds of the Rectum

Masato Kusunoki, MD; Hidenori Yanagi, MD; Nobuhisa Gondoh, MD; Yasutsugu Shoji, MD; Takehira Yamamura, MD

Arch Surg. 1996;131(7):714-717.


Abstract

Objective
To determine the accuracy of transrectal ultrasonographic (TRUS) staging of rectal villous tumors when used to select a surgical procedure.

Design
Case series.

Setting
College hospital, Hyogo, Japan.

Patients
From 1988 to 1995, 24 patients were treated for villous tumors after diagnosis by TRUS, and were followed up for 0.5 to 7.5 years.

Main Outcome Measures
Ultrasonographic tumor stage (u-T), pathologic tumor stage (p-T), biopsy findings, and surgical procedures were studied.

Results
Overall, 71% of the tumors were accurately staged by TRUS. However, 4 u-T1 and 3 u-T2 tumors were overstaged, with pathological examination showing 2 adenomas and 5 p-Tis tumors. Three of these 7 patients were overtreated surgically. The results of a biopsy predicted adenoma in 2 of the u-T1 tumors and 2 of the u-T2 tumors that were overstaged by TRUS. Pathological examination revealed that an enlarged lymphoid follicle in the mucosa had deformed the thin muscle layer of the rectal wall and abolished its continuity on TRUS imaging. The weakness of TRUS would seem to be in the accuracy of p-Tis staging.

Conclusions
Transrectal ultrasonography has the advantage of predicting malignant infiltration in rectal villous tumors. The surgeon should know the limitations of TRUS diagnosis to select the most appropriate operation for each patient.

Arch Surg. 1996;131:714-717



Author Affiliations

From the Second Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.