You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 7, July 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Preload Assessment in Trauma Patients During Large-Volume Shock Resuscitation

Michael C. Chang, MD; Thane A. Blinman, MD; Edmund J. Rutherford, MD; Loren D. Nelson, MD; John A. Morris, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1996;131(7):728-731.


Abstract

Objectives
To evaluate the utility of the right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) as a method of preload assessment in trauma patients during large-volume shock resuscitation, and to compare the RVEDVI with the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) as a predictor of preload in this patient population.

Design
Retrospective study of a consecutive series of 46 trauma patients, admitted between June 1, 1992, and June 1, 1993, who received a volumetric oximetry pulmonary artery catheter and greater than 10 L of fluid in 24 hours.

Setting
University level I trauma center.

Main Outcome Measures
Correlations of the RVEDVI and PAOP with the cardiac index (CI) during the defined study period.

Results
Three hundred fourteen measurements of the RVEDVI, PAOP, CI, and other hemodynamic variables were evaluated. Patients received a mean±SD of 22.1± 13.3 L of blood and fluid during the 24 hours. The RVEDVI correlated better (P<.001) with the CI (r=0.39) than did the PAOP (r=0.05). Furthermore, there was a better correlation (P<.04) between the RVEDVI and CI when the RVEDVI was 130 mL/m2 or less (r=0.54) than when it was greater than 130 mL/m2 (r=0.30).

Conclusions
The RVEDVI is a better predictor of preload than the PAOP in trauma patients during large-volume shock resuscitation. When the RVEDVI is 130 mL/m2 or less, volume administration will likely increase the CI.

Arch Surg. 1996;131:728-731



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Surgical Sciences, the Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (Dr Chang), and the Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (Drs Blinman, Rutherford, Nelson, and Morris).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography
Hofer et al.
Br J Anaesth 2005;94:748-755.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Head Trauma*
Marik et al.
Chest 2002;122:699-711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of the mechanical ventilatory cycle on thermodilution right ventricular volumes and cardiac output
Groeneveld et al.
J. Appl. Physiol. 2000;89:89-96.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pulmonary Artery Catheterization and Esophageal Doppler Monitoring in the ICU
Marik
Chest 1999;116:1085-1091.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advances in Critical Care Monitoring
Barie
Arch Surg 1997;132:734-739.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.