You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 1, January 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

An Increased Incidence of Rejection Episodes

One of the Causes of Worse Kidney Transplantation Survival in Black Recipients

Raymond J. Tesi, MD; Michael Deboisblanc; Chad Saul; Gary Frentz, MD; Edward Etheredge, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(1):35-39.


Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the cause of worse kidney allograft survival in black recipients, which has been the source of considerable interest and debate.

Design
Three hundred ninety-two consecutive renal allografts (O HLA mismatch grafts excluded) were reviewed. Of the recipients, 57% were black, 27% received living donor grafts, and 86% received their first transplant. All recipients underwent an oral cyclosporine induction protocol with triple drug maintenance. Crude graft survival, the risk of rejection, and the need for dialysis were determined using donor and recipient demographic and immunologic variables.

Results
Graft survival was 84%, 67%, and 50% at 1, 3, and 5 years after the transplantation, respectively. The survival of black recipients was 4%, 11%, and 20% worse than that of white recipients at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively (P<.002). When only pretransplantation variables were considered, black recipient race was the only variable that predicted graft loss in the multivariate analysis (relative risk [RR] = 1.6, P=.09). When posttransplantation and pretransplantation variables were used, cadaver donor (RR= 1.7), an episode of rejection (RR=2.6), and the need for dialysis (RR= 2.7) were independent variables that predicted graft loss (P<.001). Black recipient race was a dependent variable. Four pretransplantation variables predicted the risk of dialysis: black race (RR=3.6), male recipient (RR=2.1), cadaveric donor (RR=2.2), and a peak panel-reactive antibody level greater than 30% (RR=2.8). Three pretransplantation variables predicted the risk of rejection: black race (RR= 1.7), male recipient (RR=1.6), and a current panel-reactive antibody level greater than 30% (RR=5.3).

Conclusions
These data suggest that black recipient race is a dependent predictor of renal allograft survival when the posttransplantation events of rejection and dialysis are considered. Black recipients have more immunologic complications after renal transplantation that result in worse graft survival. These results confirm the importance of postallograft events as the major determinants of long-term graft survival and suggest that black recipients are receiving inadequate immunosuppression. These data support attempts to tailor immunosuppressive protocols to recipient pretransplantation risk profiles as a way to improve graft survival in the high-risk recipient.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:35-39



Author Affiliations

From Tulane University Medical Center, New Orleans, La.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.