You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 1, January 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Role of Venous Outflow Obstruction in Patients With Chronic Venous Dysfunction

Nicos Labropoulos, PhD, DIC; Nicos Volteas, MD; Miguel Leon, MSc, MD; Olalekay Sowade, MBBS, MSc; Alex Rulo, MD; Athanasios D. Giannoukas, MSc, MD; Andrew N. Nicolaides, MS, FRCS

Arch Surg. 1997;132(1):46-51.


Abstract

Objective
To quantify the functional venous outflow obstruction with different location and extent of obstruction attributed to previous deep vein thrombosis.

Design
Case-control study.

Setting
Vascular Laboratory, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London, England.

Patients
Two groups: group 1, 25 case patients and 9 control subjects, and group 2, 45 case patients and 30 control subjects.

Interventions
Ascending venography, duplex scanning, air plethysmography, and venous pressure measurements in the foot and the arm via a 21-gauge butterfly needle.

Main Outcome Measures
Venous outflow fraction (VOF), venous outflow resistance (VOR), and arm-foot pressure differential (A-F PD) at rest and after reactive hyperemia.

Results
Venous outflow resistance was evaluated in group 1. Twenty-two case patients underwent VOF testing, and 16 had A-F PD measurement performed. Case patients in group 2 underwent VOF testing. Signs and symptoms of chronic venous dysfunction were associated with the anatomical extent of obstruction. Limb swelling and ache were present in most of the patients; skin changes were noted in about 30% and ulceration in 10% of patients. The results of all tests showed no evidence of obstruction in control subjects. In most case patients with popliteal vein obstruction, test results were similar to those in control subjects: the more proximal the veins involved, the more severe the obstruction. In 16 case patients, all 3 tests were performed and agreement between A-F PD and VOR test results was found in 14 of them. The VOF test results agreed with the results of A-F PD and VOR tests in 9 case patients. In group 2, 50% of the limbs with obstruction proximal to the popliteal vein had a reduced VOF, which became worst in the limbs with extensive obstruction, particularly when the iliac veins were involved. Of the 73 limbs tested for VOF in both groups, only 7 limbs (9.6%) had their venous outflow markedly reduced by occlusion of the superficial veins.

Conclusions
The anatomical extent of venous obstruction and the development of collateral circulation determine the hemodynamic severity of the chronic venous obstruction. The deep collaterals seem to be more important than the superficial venous system in bypassing the obstruction. The VOR and the A-F PD tests can be used to identify those patients who have venous obstruction, whereas the use of the VOF test may reduce the need for performing the above tests in 50% of the patients.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:46-51



Author Affiliations

From the Irvine Laboratory for Cardiovascular Investigation and Research Academic Vascular Surgery Unit, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, London, England.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Varicose Veins
Raju and Neglen
NEJM 2009;360:2319-2327.
FULL TEXT  

Midterm Follow-up After Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
Gasparis et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2009;43:61-68.
ABSTRACT  

Chronic deep venous obstruction: definition, prevalence, diagnosis, management
Neglen
Phlebology 2008;23:149-157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patterns of Venous Reflux and Obstruction in Patients With Skin Damage Due to Chronic Venous Disease
Labropoulos et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2007;41:33-40.
ABSTRACT  

Etiology and Anatomic Distribution of Venous Disease in Patients with Venous Ulcers
Labropoulos and Tassiopoulos
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2000;12:117-126.
ABSTRACT  

Current Role of Air Plethysmography in Arterial and Venous Disease Management
Comerota and Eid
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1999;10:113-122.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.