You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 11, November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Twelfth Rib Resection

Preferred Therapy for Subphrenic Abscess in Selected Surgical Patients

David A. Spain, MD; Robert C. G. Martin, MD; Eddy H. Carrillo, MD; Hiram C. Polk, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(11):1203-1206.


Abstract

Objective
To assess the role of 12th rib resection in the treatment of postoperative, subphrenic abscesses.

Design
Consecutive case series.

Setting
University hospital, level I trauma center.

Patients
Operative logs for a 13-year period were reviewed for all patients undergoing 12th rib resection for drainage of a postoperative subphrenic abscess. Each individual medical record was reviewed for demographic data, primary diagnosis, computed tomographic scan findings, and clinical status (temperature, white blood cell count, and Acute, Physiologic, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation II score) at the time of rib resection.

Main Outcome Measures
Operative results, microbiological data, complications, and outcomes.

Results
Twenty-six patients underwent 27 rib resections for a secondary left subphrenic (23) or a right subhepatic (4) abscess. All patients had undergone at least 1 prior laparotomy (average, 1.5; range, 1-4). Sixteen patients had traumatic injuries, and 7 had complicated pancreatitis. Twelve patients had undergone prior failed attempts at percutaneous drainage before rib resection. Fourteen patients underwent operative drainage without attempted percutaneous drainage, mainly for peripancreatic (7) or multiloculated (3) abscesses. There were 3 postoperative complications (3/27 [11%]): a gastrocutaneous fistula, a gastrocolic-cutaneous fistula requiring laparotomy and temporary colostomy, and fasciitis in the resection site. Four (15%) of the 26 patients died: 3 died of progressive multiple system organ failure, and 1 died of an unrelated injury. The remaining 20 (77%) of the patients were discharged from the hospital with healing wounds and no further episodes of intra-abdominal infection.

Conclusions
Twelfth rib resection is an effective alternative therapy for secondary subphrenic abscesses. The nature of the incision allows for open, dependent drainage; avoids subsequent laparotomy; and effectively controls intra-abdominal infections. Twelfth rib resection remains a useful tool in the treatment of subphrenic abscess and may be the preferred approach when other attempts at abscess drainage have failed.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:1203-1206



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Louisville, Ky.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.