This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (27)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Improving Care Through Quality Improvement

Douglas A. Hale, MD; David P. Jaques, MD; Mark Molloy, MD; Richard H. Pearl, MD; David C. Schutt, MD; Juan C. d'Avis, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(2):153-157.

Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the practice of appendectomy in Department of Defense hospitals worldwide in a large-scale quality improvement initiative.

Design
Case series study.

Population and Setting
A total of 4950 consecutive nonincidental appendectomies performed in 147 Department of Defense hospitals worldwide during a 12-month period ending January 31, 1993.

Results
The mean age was 25.5 years, with 64% males and 36% females. The patients were assigned a diagnosis of normal appendix (negative appendectomy) in 632 cases (12.8%), acute appendicitis in 3286 cases (66.4%), and perforative appendicitis in 1032 cases (20.9%). The influence of inpatient and outpatient delays on perforation and negative appendectomy rates were studied. In at least 52% of all patients ultimately assigned a diagnosis of perforative appendicitis, the perforation occurred before the first outpatient contact with the health care system, and in at least 68% of all patients ultimately assigned the diagnosis of perforative appendicitis, the perforation occurred before surgical evaluation and admission. Neither outpatient delay in diagnosis nor inpatient delay in diagnosis and treatment was associated with a significant change in the rate of negative appendectomy.

Conclusions
Perforation rates are determined predominantly by patient- and primary care—related factors over which surgeons have little control. Negative appendectomies are predominantly related to the wide overlap in presenting signs and symptoms between appendicitis and the diseases that most often mimic it but do not require operative intervention. Whereas studies of this type are useful for identifying potential problems at the health care system level, the relatively small number of appendectomies performed by each surgeon precludes analysis at the practitioner level.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:153-157

Author Affiliations
From the Quality Assurance Office, Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), Washington, DC.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effects of Race, Insurance Status, and Hospital Volume on Perforated Appendicitis in Children
Smink et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:920-925.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital- and Patient-Level Characteristics and the Risk of Appendiceal Rupture and Negative Appendectomy in Children
Ponsky et al.
JAMA 2004;292:1977-1982.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnostic Accuracy in Pediatric Appendicitis
Bundy et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:514-515.
FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Hospital Volume of Pediatric Appendectomies on the Misdiagnosis of Appendicitis in Children
Smink et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:18-23.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Appendicitis at the Millennium
Birnbaum and Wilson
Radiology 2000;215:337-348.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Invited Commentary
Heydorn
Arch Surg 1997;132:157-157.
ABSTRACT