You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 2, February 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (119)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gasless Laparoscopy May Reduce the Risk of Port-Site Metastases Following Laparascopic Tumor Surgery

David I. Watson, MB, BS, FRACS; George Mathew, MS; Tanya Ellis, BSc (Hons); Carolyn F. Baigrie, DPhil, Dip RCPath; Alan M. Rofe, PhD; Glyn G. Jamieson, MS, FRACS

Arch Surg. 1997;132(2):166-168.


Abstract

Objective
To compare the incidence of port-site metastases in an experimental tumor model following tumor manipulation during laparoscopy aided by conventional insufflation with laparoscopy using a gasless technique.

Setting
An experimental model applied in a research laboratory.

Participants and Interventions
Malignant tumors were implanted in the abdominal wall of 24 rats. Twelve rats underwent tumor laceration at laparoscopy with carbon dioxide insufflation, and 12 rats underwent the same procedure during gasless laparoscopy achieved by abdominal wall suspension. Rats were killed 1 week later and were examined for evidence of tumor metastases. The surgical wounds were examined microscopically by a histopathologist who was unaware of the operative technique used and the site of origin of the specimens.

Main Outcome Measure
Histologically confirmed tumor metastasis to laparoscopic port wounds.

Results
Growth of the primary tumor was equal in both groups. Wound metastases were less likely in the gasless laparoscopy group (3 of 12 vs 10 of 12; P=.01, Fisher exact test).

Conclusion
The use of laparoscopy without gas insufflation may reduce the risk of wound metastasis following laparoscopic surgery for cancer.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:166-168



Author Affiliations

From the Royal Adelaide Centre for Endoscopic Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital (Drs Watson, Mathew, and Baigrie, Ms Ellis, and Mr Jamieson, and the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science (Dr Rofe), Adelaide, South Australia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Abdominal Wall Lift Systems in Laparoscopic Surgery: Gasless and Low-pressure Systems
Alijani and Cuschieri
SURG INNOV 2001;8:53-62.
ABSTRACT  

Protective Covering of Surgical Wounds With Honey Impedes Tumor Implantation
Hamzaoglu et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:1414-1417.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Wound Recurrences Following Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Cancer
Stocchi and Nelson
Arch Surg 2000;135:948-958.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laparoscopic Management of Benign Ovarian Disease
Mane and Penketh
SURG INNOV 1999;6:104-111.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.