You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 3, March 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Cancers

The Impact on Subsequent Surgical Excisions

Darrell N. Smith, MD; Roger Christian, MD; Jack E. Meyer, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(3):256-259.


Abstract

Objective
To compare the subsequent surgical therapy for women with nonpalpable breast cancers diagnosed by large-core needle biopsy (LCNB) vs those diagnosed by surgical excision after wire localization.

Design
Retrospective review of cases and results.

Setting
Secondary referred care.

Patients
A total of 677 women diagnosed as having breast cancer by LCNB (n=67) or by surgical excision after wire localization (n=610).

Results
Women in the LCNB group underwent an average of 1.25 surgical procedures and women whose breast cancers were diagnosed by surgical excision after preoperative wire localization underwent an average of 2.01 surgical procedures (P<.001).

Conclusions
Large-core needle biopsy decreases the number of surgical procedures in women diagnosed as having nonpalpable breast cancers. Increased implementation of this technique will substantially decrease the costs of surgical therapy in these patients.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:256-259



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Radiology (Drs Smith and Meyer) and Surgery (Dr Christian), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Comparison of Histologic Underestimation Rates with 11- and 9-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy
Lourenco et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189:W275-W279.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Full Disclosure of Breast Biopsy Options
Guenin and Margolin
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;178:1029-1030.
FULL TEXT  

One Operation After Percutaneous Diagnosis of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Frequency and Associated Factors
Liberman et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;178:673-679.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Biopsy and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy: Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer
Liberman and Cody
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;177:887-891.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium
Liberman
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000;174:1191-1199.
FULL TEXT  

Core Needle Biopsy of Challenging Benign Breast Conditions: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Reynolds
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000;174:1245-1250.
FULL TEXT  

Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
Meyer et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1638-1641.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.