You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 3, March 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The prognostic significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer

S. M. Sheen-Chen, H. L. Eng, F. F. Chou and W. J. Chen
Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in patients with lymph node-positive primary breast cancer. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: A tertiary care hospital. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive series of 123 patients with lymph node-positive primary breast cancer. INTERVENTION: The PCNA-labeling index [(PCNA-positive cells/1000 cells) x 100] was quantified in paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from 123 patients with lymph node-positive primary breast cancer by immunohistochemical staining. Other important clinicopathological variables, including estrogen receptor status, histological grade, lymph node status, primary tumor status, ploidy pattern, S-phase fraction, and TNM staging, were also identified and evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The influence of the PCNA-labeling index on the disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate. RESULTS: The PCNA-labeling index of the tissue specimens tested from 123 patients ranged from 11% to 82%. The PCNA-labeling index was closely related to primary tumor status, histological grade, TNM staging, and S-phase fraction. Between patients with a high PCNA-labeling index (> 35%) and those with a low PCNA-labeling index (< or = 35%), there were significant (P < .01) differences in both 5-year disease-free survival rates (2% vs 85%) and 5-year overall survival rates (2% vs 92%). When the PCNA-labeling index and all the clinicopathologic variables were entered into a multivariate analysis for either disease-free survival or overall survival by the Cox proportional hazards model, the PCNA-labeling index emerged as an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, the PCNA-labeling index potentially is a useful prognostic factor for lymph node-positive primary breast cancer.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.