You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 3, March 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Prognostic Significance of Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen in Patients With Lymph Node–Positive Breast Cancer

Shyr-Ming Sheen-Chen, MD, FACS; Hock-Liew Eng, MD; Fong-Fu Chou, MD; Wei-Jen Chen, MD, MS

Arch Surg. 1997;132(3):264-267.


Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the prognostic significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in patients with lymph node–positive primary breast cancer.

Design
A retrospective study.

Setting
A tertiary care hospital.

Study Participants
A consecutive series of 123 patients with lymph node–positive primary breast cancer.

Intervention
The PCNA-labeling index [(PCNA-positive cells/1000 cells) x 100] was quantified in paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from 123 patients with lymph node–positive primary breast cancer by immunohistochemical staining. Other important clinicopathological variables, including estrogen receptor status, histological grade, lymph node status, primary tumor status, ploidy pattern, S-phase fraction, and TNM staging, were also identified and evaluated. Main Outcome Measures: The influence of the PCNA-labeling index on the disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate.

Results
The PCNA-labeling index of the tissue specimens tested from 123 patients ranged from 11% to 82%. The PCNA-labeling index was closely related to primary tumor status, histological grade, TNM staging, and S-phase fraction. Between patients with a high PCNA-labeling index (>35%) and those with a low PCNA-labeling index (≤35%), there were significant (P<.01) differences in both 5-year disease-free survival rates (2% vs 85%) and 5-year overall survival rates (2% vs 92%). When the PCNA-labeling index and all the clinicopathologic variables were entered into a multivariate analysis for either disease-free survival or overall survival by the Cox proportional hazards model, the PCNA-labeling index emerged as an independent prognostic factor.

Conclusion
Based on our results, the PCNA-labeling index potentially is a useful prognostic factor for lymph node-positive primary breast cancer.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:264-267



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Surgery, the Departments of Surgery (Drs Sheen-Chen and Chou) and Pathology (Drs Eng and Chen), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, Chang Gung Medical College, Kaohsiung Hsein, Taiwan, Republic of China.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein-3 in Breast Cancer: Analysis with Tissue Microarray
SHEEN-CHEN et al.
Anticancer Res 2009;29:1131-1135.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Value of Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription 3 in Breast Cancer
Sheen-Chen et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2286-2290.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Serum Levels of Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Patients with Breast Cancer
Sheen-Chen et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:715-717.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Serum Levels of Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 in Patients With Breast Cancer
Sheen-Chen et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:937-940.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.