This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (17)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Jeffrey L. Ballard, MD; Michael K. Deiparine, MD; John J. Bergan, MD; T. J. Bunt, MD; J. David Killeen, MD; Louis L. Smith, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(3):268-271.

Abstract
Objective
To compare carotid endarterectomy (CEA) based solely on Duplex ultrasonography (DU) with CEA based on DU and arteriography.

Design and Setting
Retrospective case series analysis in a regional tertiary care center.

Patients
Consecutive sample of 194 patients undergoing 218 CEAs from January 1, 1993, through June 30, 1995, with either preoperative DU plus arteriography (165 CEAs) or DU only (53 CEAs).

Main Outcome Measures
Concordance of the 2 diagnostic imaging techniques and influence of these on the conduct of surgery, surgical outcome, and resource cost.

Results
There was agreement (=0.85) between DU and arteriography in the detection of a carotid occlusion or a stenosis greater than 45%. Arteriography demonstrated 26 aortic arch branch lesions (15.8%), 22 intracranial abnormalities (13.3%), and 6 type C ulcers (3.6%), in addition to 1 nonoccluded internal carotid artery (ICA) (0.61%) and 1 contralateral severe ICA stenosis (0.61%) inaccurately estimated by Duplex. These findings prompted 3 changes (1.8%) in surgical therapy, including 2 decisions in favor of CEA and 1 subclavian-carotid bypass added to CEA. There was no difference in the stroke and death rate for CEA based solely on DU compared with CEA based on DU and arteriography (P=.43). The mean total hospital cost was $5534 for DU only CEA vs $7608 for DU plus arteriogram CEA (mean difference=$2074, P<.01).

Conclusions
The addition of carotid arteriography to a diagnostic Duplex ultrasound study that already suggested the need for CEA did not change the operative plan in 98% (162/165) of the cases. Carotid endarterectomy based solely on DU is appropriate and cost-effective.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:268-271

Author Affiliations
From the Division of Vascular Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, Calif.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnosis of Total Internal Carotid Occlusions with Duplex Ultrasound and Ultrasound Contrast
Ohm et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2005;39:237-243.
ABSTRACT  

Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy: A Clinical and Cost Comparison of Revascularization Strategies
Gray et al.
Stroke 2002;33:1063-1070.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost of Identifying Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy
Benade and Warlow
Stroke 2002;33:435-439.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Costs and Benefits of Carotid Endarterectomy and Associated Preoperative Arterial Imaging: A Systematic Review of Health Economic Literature
Benade and Warlow
Stroke 2002;33:629-638.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Significant Reductions in Length of Stay After Carotid Endarterectomy Can Be Safely Accomplished Without Modifying Either Anesthetic Technique or Postoperative ICU Monitoring
Angevine et al.
Stroke 1999;30:2341-2346.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT