You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 5, May 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Early postoperative feeding after elective colorectal surgery

P. A. Hartsell, R. C. Frazee, J. B. Harrison and R. W. Smith
Department of Surgery, Scott & White Clinic and Memorial Hospital, Temple, USA.

BACKGROUND: Several investigators have demonstrated that routine nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery is unnecessary and can be safely eliminated, and 1 recent study demonstrated the safety of early oral feedings. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that successful early feeding would lead to a shorter duration of hospitalization and, therefore, would be more cost-effective. PATIENTS: Fifty-eight patients with elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: Patients were prospectively randomized to 1 of 2 postoperative treatment arms: early feeding (EF group, n = 29) and traditional feeding (TF group, n = 29). All patients in the EF group began a liquid diet on the first postoperative day and were advanced to a regular diet when they consumed 1000 mL in 24 hours. All patients in the TF group began a liquid diet after resolution of the postoperative ileus and were advanced to a regular diet after consuming 1000 mL in 24 hours. Patients were dismissed after tolerating two thirds of the regular diet. Both groups had intraoperative orogastric tubes that were removed at the end of surgery. Nasogastric tubes were inserted for persistent postoperative vomiting. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in age, types of procedures, or in prior abdominal surgery in either group. No significant differences were seen in rates of nausea (55% in EF vs 50% in TF group) or vomiting (48% in EF vs 33% in TF group). One patient in the EF group had aspiration pneumonia, and anastomotic leak resulted in sepsis and eventual death of 1 patient in the TF group. No significant difference was observed in length of hospital stay between the 2 groups (mean +/- SD, 7.2 +/- 3.3 days in EF vs 8.1 +/- 2.3 days in TF group). CONCLUSIONS: Early oral feeding after elective colorectal surgery is safe. Most of the patients tolerated EF; however, there was no significant difference in duration of hospitalization in these patients.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Current strategies for preventing or ameliorating postoperative ileus: A multimodal approach
Gannon
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:S8-S12.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Postoperative starvation after gastrointestinal surgery
Bozzetti et al.
BMJ 2002;324:481-481.
FULL TEXT  

Early Postoperative Oral Feeding After Colectomy: An Analysis of Factors That May Predict Failure
Petrelli et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2001;8:796-800.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early enteral feeding versus ""nil by mouth"" after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials
Lewis et al.
BMJ 2001;323:773-773.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early Feeding and the Incidence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Major Gynecologic Surgery
MACMILLAN et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:604-608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.