You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 7, July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Abdominal Operations After Lung Transplantation

Indications and Outcome

Thomas R. Pollard, MD; Wayne H. Schwesinger, MD; Edward Y. Sako, MD; Kenneth R. Sirinek, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(7):714-718.


Abstract

Objective
To assess the outcomes of abdominal operations in patients with lung transplants and identify adverse risk factors.

Design
Matched cohort study.

Setting
University referral center.

Participants
Twelve lung transplant recipients who required abdominal operations (hereafter referred to as case patients) and 12 age-, sex-, and pulmonary diagnosis–matched lung transplant recipients who had not undergone an abdominal procedure (hereafter referred to as control patients).

Interventions
Elective abdominal operations including laparoscopic cholecystectomies (n=5), laparoscopic repair of a colovaginal fistula (n=1), and open colectomy for a benign colovesical fistula (n=1) and urgent operations including bowel resections (n=3), subtotal pancreatectomy (n=1), and hepatorrhaphy for an iatrogenic liver injury (n=1).

Main Outcome Measures
Morbidity and mortality.

Results
Abdominal operations were performed in 12 (11%) of the patients undergoing lung transplantation at the university referral center since 1987, with an associated mortality rate of 25%. Morbidity and mortality rates of electively performed procedures were 28% and 14%, respectively. An urgent indication for abdominal procedure was associated with 100% morbidity and 40% mortality. Compared with a matched group of 12 control patients, the long-term survival of the case patients was reduced (18% vs 64% at 4 years). Case patients undergoing an abdominal procedure in the posttransplantation period tended to have a higher prevalence of previous rejection (67% vs 25%), a higher perioperative steroid dosage (53 mg/d vs 36 mg/d), and a significantly lower posttransplantational forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1, 1.23 L vs 1.91 L; P<.05).

Conclusions
Elective abdominal operations are relatively safe in properly prepared lung transplant recipients. However, laparotomy for urgent surgical conditions is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates caused in part by the magnitude of the abdominal operation and influenced by the status of the lung transplant as manifested by previous rejection episodes, perioperative steroid dosages, and FEV1 values.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:714-718



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pulmonary resection following lung transplantation
Fitton et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003;76:1680-1686.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.