 |
 |

Histologic Correlation of Image-Guided Core Biopsy With Excisional Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
Marita B. Acheson, MD;
Richard G. Patton, MD;
Robert L. Howisey, MD;
Robert F. Lane, MD;
Alan Morgan, MD
Arch Surg. 1997;132(8):815-821.
Abstract
 |  |
Objective To examine the histologic correlation between image-guided large-core needle biopsy (LCNB) and excisional biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Design Histologic findings of LCNB and excision specimens were reviewed for patients who underwent image—guided LCNB of nonpalpable breast lesions from April 1, 1993, to March 31, 1996. Histologic diagnosis of the excision specimen was used as a criterion standard. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years.
Setting A dedicated breast imaging clinic on the campus of an urban community hospital.
Patients Five hundred fifty-two patients with nonpalpable mammographically detected abnormalities. Main Outcome Measures: Histologic diagnoses of LCNB and excision specimens (part of a prospectively designed, ongoing quality audit process).
Results Histologic findings were benign in 389 LCNB specimens (70.5%) and abnormal in 163 (29.5%). The benign LCNB specimens remained benign on clinical and radiologic follow-up, with 1 missed malignant diagnosis. One hundred seventy-three patients underwent excision following LCNB, resulting in 10 benign and 163 abnormal specimens. Diagnoses of 102 LCNB specimens showing invasive cancer were confirmed on excision. Of 54 patients in whom LCNB specimens showed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 10 showed DCIS plus invasive cancer on excision. Of 6 patients in whom LCNB specimens showed atypical duct hyperplasia (ADH), 1 was benign, 1 showed ADH and invasive cancer, 3 showed ADH and DCIS, and 1 remained ADH exclusively on excision. The histologic diagnosis for 10 benign LCNBs remained benign after excision. Correlation coefficient was 0.93 (P<.001).
Conclusions Benign disease and invasive cancer of the breast can be diagnosed with a high level of confidence using image-guided LCNB. The histologic diagnosis for patients whose LCNB specimens show ADH or DCIS may change after excision.
Arch Surg. 1997;132:815-821
Author Affiliations
From the Multidisciplinary Team at the Seattle Breast Center, Northwest Hospital (Drs Acheson, Patton, Howisey, Lane, and Morgan), and the Departments of Pathology (Dr Patton), Surgery (Drs Howisey and Morgan), and Medicine (Dr Lane), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Treatment and Prevention of Intraepithelial Neoplasia: An Important Target for Accelerated New Agent Development : Recommendations of the American Association for Cancer Research Task Force on the Treatment and Prevention of Intraepithelial Neoplasia
O'Shaughnessy et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2002;8:314-346.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Stereotactic Breast Biopsy of Nonpalpable Lesions: Determinants of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Underestimation Rates
Jackman et al.
Radiology 2001;218:497-502.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Vacuum-Assisted Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Histologic Underestimation of Malignant Lesions
Burak et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:700-703.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Core Needle Biopsy of Challenging Benign Breast Conditions: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Reynolds
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000;174:1245-1250.
FULL TEXT
Stereotactic, Automated, Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: False-Negative and Histologic Underestimation Rates after Long-term Follow-up
Jackman et al.
Radiology 1999;210:799-805.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|