You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 8, August 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tracheobronchial Resection and Reconstruction

Douglas E. Wood, MD; Eric Valliéres, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(8):850-856.


Abstract

Objective
To assess the indications and results of airway resection and how frequently airway reconstructive options changed proposed therapy.

Design
A retrospective survey of patients undergoing major airway resection.

Setting
University of Washington–affiliated hospitals, Seattle, May 1992 through December 1996.

Patients
Fifty consecutive patients with resectable benign and malignant tracheal or main bronchial disease undergoing tracheobronchial resections.

Interventions
Patients underwent major airway resection as follows: tracheal or laryngotracheal resection, 23 patients; carinal resection, 6; and bronchial sleeve resection with or without pulmonary resection, 21. Indications for surgery were non–small cell lung cancer in 19 patients, primary airway tumor in 12, thyroid carcinoma in 1, and tracheal or bronchial stenosis in 18.

Main Outcome Measures
Change in prereferral planned therapy from palliative to definitive or to pulmonary-sparing procedure, morbidity and mortality, relief of symptoms, and survival.

Results
Mortality was 0%, and morbidity, 32% (16/50). Airway reconstruction changed the proposed therapy in 42 patients (84%). Functional results were good to excellent in 17 (94%) of 18 patients with benign disease. Patients with malignant disease had a 1-year survival of 93% (27/29) and a 2-year survival of 67% (12/18).

Conclusions
Airway resection and reconstruction provide reliable relief of benign and malignant tracheobronchial disease with minimal morbidity and mortality. Airway reconstruction frequently changed prereferral planned therapy and provided definitive and parenchymalsparing procedures to patients with complex airway lesions.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:850-856



Author Affiliations

From the Section of General Thoracic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Carinal Replacement With an Aortic Allograft
Seguin et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2006;81:1068-1074.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resection for bronchogenic carcinoma involving the carina: Long-term results and effect of nodal status on outcome
Mitchell et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2001;121:465-471.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

BRONCHOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION
Stephens and Wood
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2000;119:289-296.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.