You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 8, August 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Flap Selection as a Determinant of Success in Pressure Sore Coverage

Robert D. Foster, MD; James P. Anthony, MD; Stephen Mathes, MD; William Y. Hoffman, MD; David Young, MD; Issa Eshima, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(8):868-873.


Abstract

Objective
To establish a treatment algorithm for the long-term surgical management of pressure sores.

Design
Retrospective case series.

Setting
University-based teaching hospital.

Patients
From March 1979 to July 1995, 280 unselected pressure sore reconstructions (113 ischial, 94 sacral, and 73 trochanteric sores) were performed in 201 patients (130 men and 71 women; age range, 16-90 years; mean, 50 years). Of the patients, 90% had severe spinal cord injuries (paraplegia or quadriplegia). Forty-one percent of the wounds were chronic (present longer than 3 months).

Main Outcome Measures
Length of stay, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and flap success (defined as a completely healed wound).

Results
Overall, 89% of the flaps healed primarily (ischium, 83% [94/113]; sacrum, 91% [86/94]; trochanter, 93% [68/73]). Three fourths of cases were treated in a single stage (debridement and reconstruction). The inferior gluteus maximus island flap (ischium) (94% [32/34]), the V-Y gluteus maximus advancement flap (sacrum) (97% [36/37]), and the tensor fascia lata flap (trochanter) (95% [42/44]) had the highest success rates. Flap success was not significantly affected by the size of the pressure sore or the number of previous flaps used. Postoperative hospital stays averaged 20 days. The overall complication rate was 28%, most commonly from a slight wound edge dehiscence.

Conclusions
Flap selection and the appropriate short-and long-term sequence of flap use significantly improve success rates for pressure sore coverage. Reconstruction can be reliably performed in a single stage with a relatively short hospitalization.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:868-873



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California at San Francisco.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Principles in the Operative Treatment of Pressure Sores
Wechselberger et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:465-465.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.