You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 8, August 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  PAPERS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Preemptive Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Appendectomy

Clifford Y. Ko, MD; Jesse E. Thompson, Jr, MD; Amelia Alcantara, CRNA, MS; Darryl Hiyama, MD

Arch Surg. 1997;132(8):874-878.


Abstract



Objective
To evaluate the use of preemptive analgesia in patients who were undergoing an operation for acute appendicitis.

Design
Double-blind, randomized control trial.

Setting
Public hospital.

Patients
Patients who presented with presumed appendicitis.

Intervention
Patients received 1 of the following treatments: group 1, preemptive analgesia with a combination of lidocaine hydrochloride and bupivacaine hydrochloride; group 2, preemptive analgesia with saline solution; or group 3, nothing.

Main Outcome Measures
The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, analgesic requirements, number of analgesic doses required, and length of hospital stay.

Results
No differences were noted in postoperative pain, the total number of analgesic doses per day, the quantity of narcotic medication administered, and the length of hospital stay.

Conclusions
Compared with healthy control subjects, preemptive analgesia did not reduce postoperative pain, reduce analgesic requirements, or shorten the length of hospital stay in patients who underwent an appendectomy. Preemptive analgesia may be applicable only for patients without preoperative pain.

Arch Surg. 1997;132:874-878



Author Affiliations



From the Departments of Surgery, Olive View–UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, Calif (Drs Ko, Thompson, and Hiyama and Ms Alcantara), and UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (Drs Ko, Thompson, and Hiyama).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Efficacy of Preemptive Analgesia for Acute Postoperative Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis
Ong et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2005;100:757-773.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effects of Pretreatment with Lidocaine or Bupivacaine on the Spatial and Temporal Expression of c-Fos Protein in the Spinal Cord Caused by Plantar Incision in the Rat
Sun et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2004;98:1093-1098.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.