 |
 |

Preemptive Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Appendectomy
Clifford Y. Ko, MD;
Jesse E. Thompson, Jr, MD;
Amelia Alcantara, CRNA, MS;
Darryl Hiyama, MD
Arch Surg. 1997;132(8):874-878.
Abstract
 |  |
Objective To evaluate the use of preemptive analgesia in patients who were undergoing an operation for acute appendicitis.
Design Double-blind, randomized control trial.
Setting Public hospital.
Patients Patients who presented with presumed appendicitis.
Intervention Patients received 1 of the following treatments: group 1, preemptive analgesia with a combination of lidocaine hydrochloride and bupivacaine hydrochloride; group 2, preemptive analgesia with saline solution; or group 3, nothing.
Main Outcome Measures The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, analgesic requirements, number of analgesic doses required, and length of hospital stay.
Results No differences were noted in postoperative pain, the total number of analgesic doses per day, the quantity of narcotic medication administered, and the length of hospital stay.
Conclusions Compared with healthy control subjects, preemptive analgesia did not reduce postoperative pain, reduce analgesic requirements, or shorten the length of hospital stay in patients who underwent an appendectomy. Preemptive analgesia may be applicable only for patients without preoperative pain.
Arch Surg. 1997;132:874-878
Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Surgery, Olive View–UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, Calif (Drs Ko, Thompson, and Hiyama and Ms Alcantara), and UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (Drs Ko, Thompson, and Hiyama).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The Efficacy of Preemptive Analgesia for Acute Postoperative Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis
Ong et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2005;100:757-773.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Effects of Pretreatment with Lidocaine or Bupivacaine on the Spatial and Temporal Expression of c-Fos Protein in the Spinal Cord Caused by Plantar Incision in the Rat
Sun et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2004;98:1093-1098.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|