You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 1, January 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (40)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Efficacy of a Dry Fibrin Sealant Dressing for Hemorrhage Control After Ballistic Injury

LTC John Holcomb, MC, USA; Martin MacPhee, PhD; LTC Stephen Hetz, MC, USA; LTC Richard Harris, VC, USA; CPT Anthony Pusateri, MS, USA; COL John Hess, MC, USA

Arch Surg. 1998;133:32-35.

Objective  To determine if a dry fibrin sealant dressing (DFSD) will provide superior hemostasis when compared with regular gauze in a ballistic injury animal model.

Design  A nonsurvival randomized goat study.

Setting  A federal biomedical research institute.

Subjects  Eighteen anesthetized Angora goats.

Interventions  Uncontrolled hemorrhage was induced by a complex ballistic extremity injury. Control of hemorrhage was achieved by applying and holding pressure with the DFSD or regular gauze for 2 minutes. The dressings were left in place for 1 hour.

Main Outcome Measures  Total blood loss, mean arterial pressure, ballistic injury, and mortality were recorded after 1 hour.

Results  The injuries were equivalent for the 2 groups. No animal mortality was seen. After 1 hour, the mean(±SEM) blood loss was 124±64 mL in the DFSD-treated group and 377±64 mL in the gauze dressings–treated group (P=.01). Twenty minutes after injury, the mean arterial pressure was 95.0 mm Hg (±SEM, ±4.7 mm Hg) in the DFSD-treated group and 70.0±5.0 mm Hg in the gauze dressings–treated group. The difference persisted for the remainder of the study (P=.01).

Conclusion  The DFSD was superior to gauze in decreasing blood loss and maintaining blood pressure while retaining the simplicity of standard dressing application.


From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Holcomb and Hetz) and Clinical Investigation (Drs Harris and Pusateri), William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Tex; the American Red Cross Holland Laboratory, Rockville, Md (Dr MacPhee); and the Blood Research Detachment, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC (Dr Hess).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effective Control of Hepatic Bleeding With a Novel Collagen-Based Composite Combined With Autologous Plasma: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Chapman et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:1200-1204.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fibrin Sealant as a Hemostatic Agent in Vascular Surgery
Jackson
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2000;13:85-94.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.