You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 1, January 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Angiology
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Angiography for Preoperative Evaluation in Patients With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Are the Benefits Worth the Risks?

Stephen M. Cohn, MD; Beth A. Moller, MSN; Paul M. Zieg, MD; Kerry A. Milner, MSN; Peter B. Angood, MD

Arch Surg. 1998;133:50-55.

Objective  To evaluate the benefits and risks of selective angiography for the evaluation of acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding to identify the site of bleeding and theoretically limit the extent of colonic resection.

Design  Retrospective chart review.

Setting  Tertiary care hospital.

Patients  Sixty-five patients undergoing 75 selective angiograms for evaluation of acute lower GI bleeding. Mean age was 71 years (range, 27-93 years), and 37 (57%) were women.

Main Outcome Measures  Demographic data were collected that included any associated medical problems, potential factors contributing to an increased risk for bleeding, and the diagnostic methods used in evaluating the source of lower GI bleeding. The details of angiography procedures were recorded with special attention to the impact of the procedure on clinical management and any associated complications.

Results  Twenty-three patients (35%) had positive angiography findings, and 14 of them (61%) required operations. Forty-two patients (65%) had negative angiography findings, and 8 of them (19%) required operations. Surgery for the 22 patients included hemicolectomy in 11 patients, subtotal colectomy in 10 patients, and small-bowel tumor resection in 1 patient. In 9 patients, a hemicolectomy was performed on the basis of angiography findings. Three patients (2 with negative angiography findings) experienced rebleeding after a hemicolectomy and required a subsequent subtotal colectomy. Overall, only 8 (12%) of the 65 patients underwent a segmental colon resection that was based on angiography findings and did not bleed after their operation. Complications from angiography occurred in 7 patients (11%).

Conclusion  Selective angiography appears to add little clinically useful information in patients with acute lower GI bleeding and carries a relatively high complication risk.


From the Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Subtraction Scintigraphy in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Hemorrhage
Currie
J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2007;35:140-147.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preoperative Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding
McGuire
Arch Surg 1998;133:781-781.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.