 |
|
A Critical Reappraisal of Indications for Fasciotomy After Extremity Vascular Trauma
Ziad Abouezzi, MD;
Zahi Nassoura, MD;
Rao R. Ivatury, MD;
John M. Porter, MD;
William M. Stahl, MD
Arch Surg. 1998;133:547-551.
Objective To critically reevaluate the indications for fasciotomy in vascular trauma of the extremities.
Design Case-control study.
Setting Level I trauma center.
Materials and Methods One hundred sixty-three vascular injuries to the extremeties were analyzed. Fasciotomy as an adjunct to vascular repair was performed in 45 limbs (28%), based either on the nature of injury or measured compartment pressure of greater than 35 mm Hg.
Main Outcome Measures Need for fasciotomy or limb amputation.
Results Fasciotomy was performed for 29.5% of isolated arterial injuries, 15.2% of isolated venous injuries, and 31.6% of combined arterial and venous injuries, and was not related to venous repair or ligation. Seven delayed fasciotomies were performed either for vascular repair failure (5 patients) or compartment syndrome (2 patients). The highest incidence was for popliteal vessel injury (arterial 57%, combined 61%). Of the 33 lower-extremity fasciotomies, 58% were for popliteal vessel injury. In 51 combined injuries of the lower extremity, only 7 (19%) of 38 patients with injury above the knee required fasciotomy, as compared with 8 (62%) of 13 with injury to the popliteal vessels (P<.001), with or without venous repair. There were 3 amputations, all resulting from vascular repair failure.
Conclusions The presence of a combined vascular injury or the need for venous ligation does not necessitate routine fasciotomy. The need for fasciotomy may be maximal for injuries to popliteal vessels.
From the Department of Surgery, New York Medical College and Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, Bronx, NY.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The Management of Trauma Venous Injury: Civilian and Wartime Experiences
Quan et al.
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2006;18:149-156.
ABSTRACT
|
