You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 5, May 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Critical Reappraisal of Indications for Fasciotomy After Extremity Vascular Trauma

Ziad Abouezzi, MD; Zahi Nassoura, MD; Rao R. Ivatury, MD; John M. Porter, MD; William M. Stahl, MD

Arch Surg. 1998;133:547-551.

Objective  To critically reevaluate the indications for fasciotomy in vascular trauma of the extremities.

Design  Case-control study.

Setting  Level I trauma center.

Materials and Methods  One hundred sixty-three vascular injuries to the extremeties were analyzed. Fasciotomy as an adjunct to vascular repair was performed in 45 limbs (28%), based either on the nature of injury or measured compartment pressure of greater than 35 mm Hg.

Main Outcome Measures  Need for fasciotomy or limb amputation.

Results  Fasciotomy was performed for 29.5% of isolated arterial injuries, 15.2% of isolated venous injuries, and 31.6% of combined arterial and venous injuries, and was not related to venous repair or ligation. Seven delayed fasciotomies were performed either for vascular repair failure (5 patients) or compartment syndrome (2 patients). The highest incidence was for popliteal vessel injury (arterial 57%, combined 61%). Of the 33 lower-extremity fasciotomies, 58% were for popliteal vessel injury. In 51 combined injuries of the lower extremity, only 7 (19%) of 38 patients with injury above the knee required fasciotomy, as compared with 8 (62%) of 13 with injury to the popliteal vessels (P<.001), with or without venous repair. There were 3 amputations, all resulting from vascular repair failure.

Conclusions  The presence of a combined vascular injury or the need for venous ligation does not necessitate routine fasciotomy. The need for fasciotomy may be maximal for injuries to popliteal vessels.


From the Department of Surgery, New York Medical College and Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, Bronx, NY.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acute traumatic compartment syndrome: a systematic review of results of fasciotomy
Hayakawa et al.
Trauma 2009;11:5-35.
ABSTRACT  

The Management of Trauma Venous Injury: Civilian and Wartime Experiences
Quan et al.
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2006;18:149-156.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.