You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 6, June 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (37)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery

A Single Surgeon's Experience

Theodore J. Saclarides, MD

Arch Surg. 1998;133:595-599.

Objective  To evaluate a single surgeon's experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with regard to incidence of complications, recurrence rate of benign and malignant lesions, and impact on the treatment of rectal cancer.

Design  Prospective tumor registry.

Setting  Tertiary care university hospital.

Patients  Seventy-three patients undergoing TEM between January 1991 and November 1996.

Main Outcome Measures  Complications, recurrence rates, and use of this technique with respect to radical operations.

Results  The arrival of TEM was associated with an increase in the number of operations for rectal cancer; however, the use of TEM remained constant relative to radical resections. Use of TEM resection alone is appropriate for all adenomas and cancers staged Tis and T1. Use of TEM alone is not an appropriate treatment for T2 cancers. Four patients (5%) experienced fecal soilage, which was long lasting in only 1 (1%).

Conclusions  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe technique and provides improved access to lesions in the middle and upper rectum. Thus far, it has not had a significant impact in the overall treatment of rectal cancer.


From the Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Ill.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Oncological Outcome After Local Excision of Rectal Carcinomas
Borschitz et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:3101-3108.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Local Recurrence After Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Rectal Polyps and Early Cancers
Ganai et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006;13:547-556.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: A Viable Operative Alternative in Selected Patients With Rectal Lesions
Neary et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2003;10:1106-1111.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Alternatives Has Minimally Invasive Surgery Provided the Surgeon?
Rothschild
Arch Surg 1998;133:1156-1159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.