You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 6, June 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Empyema

Lynette A. Scherer, MD; Felix D. Battistella, MD; John T. Owings, MD; Michael M. Aguilar, MD

Arch Surg. 1998;133:637-642.

Background  Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) appears to be replacing open thoracotomy for the treatment of posttraumatic thoracic complications.

Objective  To compare operative times, complication rates, and outcomes in patients who underwent VATS vs open thoracotomy.

Design  Retrospective review.

Setting  University hospital, level I trauma center.

Patients  Trauma patients who between December 1993 and May 1997 underwent open thoracotomy or VATS to drain a persistent thoracic collection.

Methods  Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, operative times, and clinical outcomes.

Results  Of the 524 trauma patients requiring tube thoracostomy, 22 underwent 23 procedures to drain empyema (17 VATS, 6 thoracotomies [based on surgeon preference]). There were no differences in age, Injury Severity Score, or mechanism of injury between the 2 groups. Three patients who underwent VATS (18%) required conversion to open thoracotomy for adequate drainage. All remaining patients who underwent VATS had successful treatment of their empyema. Complication rates (VATS=29%, open thoracotomy=33%; P=.99), operative times (VATS=3.4 ± 1.3 hours [mean ± SD], open thoracotomy=3.0 ± 1.5 hours; P =.46), postoperative epidural catheter use (VATS=31%, open thoracotomy=50%; P =.63), duration of chest tube drainage (VATS=5.1 ± 1.7 days [mean ± SD], open thoracotomy=4.5 ± 1.5 days; P =.48), and hospital stay after the procedure (VATS=16±14 days [mean ± SD], open thoracotomy=11 ± 5 days; P =.39) were similar for both groups.

Conclusions  Video-assisted thoracic surgery was a safe and effective operative strategy for the treatment of posttraumatic empyema. Therefore, because VATS has been shown in nontrauma patients to reduce morbidity and because it provides better cosmesis, we believe that it should be the initial operative approach to trauma patients with suspected posttraumatic empyema.


From the Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Thoracoscopic evacuation of retained posttraumatic hemothorax
Navsaria et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004;78:282-285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of empyema: intraoperative decision making
Roberts
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003;76:225-230.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Morbidity of percutaneous tube thoracostomy in trauma patients
Deneuville
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2002;22:673-678.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"Alternative" Surgery in Trauma Management
Britt and Cole
Arch Surg 1998;133:1177-1181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.