 |
|
Objective Evaluation of a Laparoscopic Surgical Skill Program for Residents and Senior Surgeons
James C. Rosser, Jr, MD;
Ludie E. Rosser, BSc;
Raghu S. Savalgi, MD, PhD(Surg), FRCS
Arch Surg. 1998;133:657-661.
Background Laparoscopic surgery adapts poorly to apprenticeship models for general surgical training. Standardized skill acquisition and validation programs, targeted performance goals, and a supervised, enforced, skill-based curriculum that readily can be shared between trainee and instructor must replace the observation and incremental skill-acquisition model used in an open surgical environment. The Yale Laparoscopic Skills and Suturing Program was used to develop a data bank for objective evaluation of dexterity and suturing skills for laparoscopic surgical training. The current study compares trainee and senior surgeon performance in this standardized training program.
Objective To compare objectively evaluated laparoscopic surgical skills and suturing capability of senior surgeons and of residents after they have completed the same standardized training regimen.
Methods Two hundred ninety-one trained surgeons performed 8730 standardized laparoscopic dexterity drills and 2910 intracorporeal suturing exercises in the Yale Laparoscopic Skills and Suturing Program. Their performance was supervised by an instructor who recorded performance and timing of the tasks in a 2 -day program. Ninety-nine residents performed the same drills and exercises the same number of times and followed the same technique for intracorporeal suturing. Percentile graphs were prepared for each type of drill and suturing exercise to allow comparison of levels of achievement among different training groups.
Results The performance of the residents was the same as that of trained surgeons for the rope pass drill and the suturing exercise. Residents in comparison with trained surgeons performed the triangle transfer drill faster and the new cup drop drill and old cup drop drill more slowly. There was no significant difference in performance between male and female residents.
Conclusion Basic skills relevant to laparoscopic performance can be acquired with a high level of competence in a brief course unrelated to prior surgical experience, sex, or age.
From the Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Broad-Based Fellowships: A Cornerstone of Minimally Invasive Surgery Education and Dissemination
Balaa et al.
SURG INNOV 2007;14:205-210.
ABSTRACT
Evaluating Intraoperative Laparoscopic Skill: Direct Observation Versus Blinded Videotaped Performances
Vassiliou et al.
SURG INNOV 2007;14:211-216.
ABSTRACT
Assessing Technical Skill in Surgery and Endoscopy: A Set of Metrics and an Algorithm (C-PASS) to Assess Skills in Surgical and Endoscopic Procedures
Stylopoulos and Vosburgh
SURG INNOV 2007;14:113-121.
ABSTRACT
The Impact of Video Games on Training Surgeons in the 21st Century
Rosser et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:181-186.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The pretrained novice: using simulation-based training to improve learning in the operating room.
Van Sickle et al.
SURG INNOV 2006;13:198-204.
ABSTRACT
Real-Time Objective Assessment of Knot Quality With a Portable Tensiometer Is Superior to Execution Time for Assessment of Laparoscopic Knot-Tying Performance
Ritter et al.
SURG INNOV 2005;12:233-237.
ABSTRACT
Have You Wondered About Your Colleague's Surgical Skills?
Alleman and Al-Assaf
American Journal of Medical Quality 2005;20:78-82.
ABSTRACT
Developing and Testing Competency Levels for Laparoscopic Skills Training
Korndorffer et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:80-84.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Telementoring
Rosser et al.
SURG INNOV 2003;10:209-217.
ABSTRACT
What Alternatives Has Minimally Invasive Surgery Provided the Surgeon?
Rothschild
Arch Surg 1998;133:1156-1159.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
