 |
|
Surgery vs Endoscopy as Primary Treatment in Symptomatic Patients With Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones
A Multicenter Randomized Trial
Bertrand Suc, MD;
Jean Escat, MD;
Daniel Cherqui, MD;
Gilles Fourtanier, MD;
Jean-Marie Hay, MD;
Abe Fingerhut, MD;
Bertrand Millat, MD;
for the French Associations for Surgical Research
Arch Surg. 1998;133:702-708.
Objective To compare surgical treatment (ST) with endoscopic management (EM) in patients with suspected common bile duct stones.
Patients Two hundred twenty eligible patients originating from 18 surgery units. Patients enrolled in this multicenter randomized study had clinical symptoms that included jaundice, mild pancreatitis (Ranson score  2), or mild acute cholangitis; biliary colic (with increased alkaline phosphatase levels); and common bile duct stones or a common bile duct diameter of 1 cm or larger on ultrasonography.
Methods Two hundred two patients were randomly assigned to either ST (n=105) or EM (n=97) during a 5-year period. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and clinical presentation.
Main Outcome Measures The rates of early postoperative additional procedures necessary to deal with the impossibility to perform the initial procedure, complications, and retained stones after ST or EM. Subsidiary endpoints were intention-to-treat analyses of mortality and of major complications and the duration of hospital stay.
Results Surgical treatment was associated with a significantly (P<.001) lower rate of 1 or 2 additional procedures (8% vs 29%) due to a significantly lower rate of the impossibility to perform the initial procedure (0% vs 5%) (P<.05), major complications (4% vs 13%) (P<.05), and retained stones (6% vs 16%) (P<.04). Minor complications occurred more often in patients having ST (4%) than in those having EM (0%) (P<.01). Cholecystectomy was performed routinely in 102 patients having ST and electively in 36 patients having EM. There was 1 death in each group initially. On an intention-to-treat analysis, 3 deaths (3.1%) occurred after EM and 1 (0.9%) after ST; this difference was not statistically significant (P=.56). Major complications occurred in 4% of patients having ST compared with 11% of patients having EM (P<.002). The median duration of hospital stay was 16 days in patients having ST and 12 days in those having EM; this difference was not statistically significant (P=.09).
Conclusion Whether an additional cholecystectomy is performed routinely or electively, the high risk of additional procedures after EM precludes its use as the optimal therapy in patients with symptomatic common bile duct stones, except in those with severe cholangitis.
From the Digestive Surgery Units, Hôpital Rangueil, Toulouse (Drs Suc, Escat, and Fourtanier); Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil (Dr Cherqui); Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes (Dr Hay); Hôpital Léon Touladjian, Poissy (Dr Fingerhut); and Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier (Dr Millat), France.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS)
Williams et al.
Gut 2008;57:1004-1021.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Optimizing Choledocholithiasis Management: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Poulose et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:43-48.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prospective Trials in Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration
Millat et al.
SURG INNOV 2000;7:279-287.
ABSTRACT
Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography in the Management of Bile Duct Stones
Demartines et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:148-152.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Management of Benign Biliary Strictures: Biliary Enteric Anastomosis vs Endoscopic Stenting
Tocchi et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:153-157.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
