This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (25)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Quality of Life  • Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut  • Thoracic Surgery  • Gastrointestinal Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic

Is It Worthwhile?

Wael Z. Tamim, MD; Robert S. Davidson, MD; Robert M. Quinlan, MD; Michael A. O'Shea, MB, BCh; Richard K. Orr, MD; Richard S. Swanson, MD

Arch Surg. 1998;133:722-726.

Background  With promising results from several institutions, many centers began treating patients with esophageal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NC) followed by esophagectomy. This approach is demanding for the patient and has not been proved to be better than esophagectomy alone.

Objective  To assess survival time and measures of quality of life associated with NC.

Design  A retrospective review during 1990 to 1996.

Setting  The 3 tertiary academic hospitals affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.

Participants  All patients (N=51) with cancer of the middle or lower esophagus who were treated with NC followed by esophagectomy during this period.

Main Outcome Measures  Median and 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival times; median preoperative treatment time (first office visit for surgical consultation before beginning NC to the date of surgery), median hospital stay, and postoperative swallowing function.

Results  The median survival time of all patients was 16.3 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 67%, 46%, and 39%, respectively. The median hospital stay was 12 days. The median postoperative treatment time was 3.3 months, which was 20% of the median survival time. Of the 51 patients, 19 were alive with a median follow-up time of 2.5 years. Twenty-nine percent of the patients had a complete pathological response with median and 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 17.5 months, 73%, 57%, and 57%, respectively. Palliation of dysphagia was excellent, with 44 (93%) of 47 operative survivors taking either a soft diet (18 [38]) or a regular(26 [55]) diet by the first postoperative visit.

Conclusions  Median survival time with NC followed by esophagectomy for resectable cancer of the esophagus does not appear to be significantly better than that reported for esophagectomy alone. Further, treatment time with NC consumed 20% of survival time. Examining only these outcome variables suggests that NC is not worthwhile. However, examining a longer-term outcome survival variable, such as 3-year survival time, suggests that NC followed by esophagectomy may result in greater long-term survival than that reported for esophagectomy alone. We conclude that further randomized, controlled studies are necessary before NC followed by esophagectomy is considered superior to esophagectomy alone for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer.

From the Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System Does Not Accurately Predict Survival in Patients Receiving Multimodality Therapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Rizk et al.
JCO 2007;25:507-512.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Induction Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy on Pulmonary Function and Postoperative Acute Respiratory Complications in Esophageal Cancer
Abou-Jawde et al.
Chest 2005;128:250-255.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Postesophagectomy morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay after preoperative chemoradiation therapy
Doty et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002;74:227-231.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Minerva should not review retrospective audits
Hill
BMJ 1999;318:400a-400.
FULL TEXT