You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 7, July 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology, Other
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Preoperative Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Comparative Study

François Paye, MD; Pascal Jagot, MD; Valérie Vilgrain, MD; Olivier Farges, MD, PhD; Dominique Borie, MD; Jacques Belghiti, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1998;133:767-772.

Objective  To assess the efficacy and adverse effects of preoperative transcatheter chemoembolization (CE) on surgical resection, postoperative outcome, and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Design  A before-after trial comparing a group of patients undergoing liver resection after CE (CE group) with a group of patients undergoing liver resection without prior CE (control group), matched for tumor size and underlying liver disease.

Setting  A tertiary care university hospital in a metropolitan area.

Patients  Twenty-four patients in each group, treated between 1986 and 1992.

Interventions  A mean of 1.6±0.2 preoperative CE procedures were performed per patient in the CE group. Tumorectomies, segmentectomies, and major liver resections were performed with a comparable frequency in each group.

Results  Overall, CE was not associated with a significant reduction of tumor size (7.8±1 cm prior to CE vs 7.1±1 cm after CE) or {alpha}-fetoprotein levels (2560±2091 µg/L prior to CE vs 1788±1270 µg/L after the last CE). Chemoembolization promoted tumor necrosis but did not influence tumor encapsulation, invasion of the capsule, venous permeation, presence of daughter nodules, or surgical margins. Liver resection was rendered more difficult by preoperative CE as a result of pediculitis and gallbladder lesions in 37% of patients, but the postoperative course was not altered. Disease-free survival (33±12% vs 32±12% at 3 years) and overall survival were comparable.

Conclusions  Convincing evidence is lacking to support systematic preoperative CE in patients with initially resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Further studies should aim to identify the subgroup of patients who may benefit from this neoadjuvant treatment.


From the Departments of Digestive Surgery (Drs Paye, Jagot, Farges, Borie, and Belghiti) and Radiology (Dr Vilgrain), Hôpital Beaujon, University Paris VII, Clichy, France.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Tumors: Postablation Syndrome
Dodd et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;185:51-57.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.