This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (18)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies  • Alert me on articles by topic

George C. Velmahos, MD, PhD; Linda Chan, PhD; Michael Chan; Raymond Tatevossian, BS; Edward E. Cornwell III, MD; Juan A. Asensio, MD; Thomas V. Berne, MD; Demetrios Demetriades, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1998;133:947-952.

Objective  To examine the hypothesis that the futility of short-term care for trauma patients requiring emergency operation can be determined based on the number of units of blood transfused and associated risk factors.

Design  A 4-year retrospective review of a cohort of critically injured patients who underwent an emergency operation.

Setting  A large-volume, academic level I, urban trauma center.

Patients  One hundred forty-one consecutive patients received massive blood transfusions of 20 U or more of blood during preoperative and intraoperative resuscitation (highest, 68 U). There were 43 survivors (30.5%) and 98 nonsurvivors (69.5%).

Main Outcome Measures  Mortality.

Results  The number of blood units transfused did not differ between survivors and nonsurvivors (mean±SD, 31±11 vs 32±10; P=.52). Stepwise multiple regression analysis identified 3 independent variables associated with mortality: need for aortic clamping, intraoperative use of inotropes, and intraoperative time with a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or less. However, blood usage was not different among the subgroups of patients who had 1 or more of these risk factors. When patients were stratified according to the amount of massive blood transfusion (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, and 50-68 U), the incidence of risk factors was not different across the 4 subgroups. Survival in the presence of risk factors was not affected by the amount of blood transfused.

Conclusions  Although mortality among critically injured patients requiring operation and massive blood transfusion can be correlated with independent risk factors, discontinuation of short-term care cannot be justified based on the need for massive blood transfusion of up to 68 units.

From the Divisions of Trauma and Critical Care (Drs Velmahos, Cornwell, Asensio, Berne, and Demetriades and Messrs Chan and Tatevossian) and Biostatistics (Dr Chan), Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Medical School and the Los Angeles County+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A study of blood product use in patients with major trauma in Scotland: analysis of a major trauma database
McRoberts et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2007;24:325-329.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vascular trauma
Strong and Edwards
Trauma 2002;4:39-63.
ABSTRACT  

Improved Survival Following Massive Transfusion in Patients Who Have Undergone Trauma
Cinat et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:964-968.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT