 |
 |

Effect of Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on Patient Outcome in Hepatic Transplantation
Thomas V. Cacciarelli, MD;
Emmet B. Keeffe, MD;
Dan H. Moore, PhD;
Washington Burns, MD;
Stephan Busque, MD;
Waldo Concepcion, MD;
Samuel K. S. So, MD;
Carlos O. Esquivel, MD, PhD
Arch Surg. 1999;134:25-29.
Objective To evaluate the effect of intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) on patient and graft survival.
Design A retrospective study.
Setting A tertiary care referral center.
Patients Between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1994, medical records from 225 adult patients who underwent primary liver transplantations were analyzed.
Results Overall patient survival was 90% at 1 year and 86% at 3 years, while graft survival was 89% at 1 year and 85% at 3 years. The following factors were associated with patient and graft survival: age, sex, medical condition at the time of transplantation, and intraoperative transfusion of RBCs. When these factors were subjected to a multivariate analysis, all were independently associated with survival. Fifty-four recipients (24%) underwent transplantation without intraoperative transfusion of RBCs, while 171 recipients (76%) received at least 1 U of RBCs intraoperatively. Recipients who did not receive transfusion of RBCs had higher patient and graft survival rates than patients who did receive RBCs. By multivariate analysis, transplantation without intraoperative transfusion of RBCs no longer remained statistically significant, and only sex and the patient's medical condition were independently associated with patient and graft survival. Patient and graft survival decreased if 5 or more U were transfused, but transfusion of 5 or more U was not independently associated with survival by multivariate analysis.
Conclusions Increased transfusion requirement for RBCs was independently associated with patient and graft survival. While transplantation without transfusion of intraoperative RBCs was associated with superior patient and graft survival, these effects were overridden by patient sex and medical condition at the time of transplantation.
From the Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (Drs Cacciarelli, Keeffe, Busque, Concepcion, So, and Esquivel); and the Research Institute (Dr Moore) and Department of Pathology (Dr Burns), California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
The Impact of Intraoperative Transfusion of Platelets and Red Blood Cells on Survival After Liver Transplantation
de Boer et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2008;106:32-44.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact of a Transfusion-Free Program on Non-Jehovah's Witness Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation
Jabbour et al.
Arch Surg 2006;141:913-917.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Comparison of Transfusion Requirements Between Living Donation and Cadaveric Donation Liver Transplantation: Relationship to Model of End-Stage Liver Disease Score and Baseline Coagulation Status
Frasco et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2005;101:30-37.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reduction of blood product transfusions during liver transplantation
Massicotte et al.
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2005;52:545-546.
FULL TEXT
Survival rate changes with transfusion of blood products during liver transplantation: [Le taux de survie change avec la transfusion de produits sanguins pendant la transplantation hepatique]
Massicotte et al.
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2005;52:148-155.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Transfusion Predictors in Liver Transplant
Massicotte et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2004;98:1245-1251.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
LIVER TRANSPLANTS: SHOULD WE TRANSFUSE?
Massicotte
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2003;50:A88-88.
FULL TEXT
Intraoperative blood losses and transfusion requirements during adult liver transplantation remain difficult to predict : [Les pertes sanguines peroperatoires et les besoins transfusionnels restent toujours difficiles a predire pendant la greffe du foie]
Steib et al.
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2001;48:1075-1079.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Erythrocyte transfusion: friend or foe?
Hardy and Belisle
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2001;48:R10-10.
FULL TEXT
|