 |
 |

Prognostic Factors in T1 and T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus
Mitsuo Tachibana, MD;
Shoichi Kinugasa, MD;
Dipok Kumar Dhar, MD;
Hideki Tabara, MD;
Reiko Masunaga, MD;
Tsukasa Kotoh, MD;
Hirofumi Kubota, MD;
Naofumi Nagasue, MD
Arch Surg. 1999;134:50-54.
Background Prognostic indicators in patients with T2 tumor have not been fully understood.
Objective To clarify the clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term results of T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus.
Design Consecutive case series.
Setting Department of surgery in a university hospital.
Patients Of 234 patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus, 142 patients underwent esophagectomy with curative intent: 97 patients had pT1 and pT2 tumors.
Interventions Investigated were clinicopathologic characteristics of 65 of 97 patients with pT1 and pT2 tumors; excluded were 7 patients who died of postoperative complications and another 25 patients who died of causes other than esophageal cancer.
Main Outcome Measures Clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term results.
Results Pathologic tumor stages were pT1 N0 in 23 patients, pT1 N(+) in 7 patients, pT2 N0 in 15 patients, and pT2 N(+) in 20 patients. Fifty patients are alive and free of cancer and 15 patients died of tumor recurrence (1 patient with pT1 N0 tumor, 1 patient with pT1 N[+][+] tumor, 1 patient with pT2 N0 tumor, and 12 patients with pT2 N[+] tumor). The sites of metastatic nodes in 6 survivors with pT1 N(+) tumor were a solitary perigastric node in 4 patients, a solitary mediastinal node in 1 patient, and 2 mediastinal nodes in 1 patient. The 5-year survival rates of patients with pT1 N0, pT1 N(+), and pT2 N0 tumors all exceeded 85%, and the rate of those with pT2 N(+) tumor was 33.9% (pT2 N[+] vs others: pT1 N0, pT1 N[+], and pT2 N0; P=.003). The factors affecting survival rate by univariate analysis were Borrmann classification (0, 1 vs 2, 3, 4), tumor size (<4.0 vs 4.0 cm), combined T, N factor (pT2 N[+] vs others), time of operation ( 420 vs >420 minutes), estimated blood loss (<1000 vs 1000 mL), and lymph vessel invasion (marked vs not marked). Stage pT2 N(+) tumor became a single independent prognostic factor for survival as determined by multivariate analysis (pT2 N[+] vs others; P=.008).
Conclusions Stage pT1 N(+) tumors with a few diseased nodes and pT2 N0 tumors are considered to be a group with an excellent prognosis, similar to pT1 N0 tumors. Patients with pT2 N(+) diseases had worse prognoses and thus should have meticulous lymph node dissection and extensive adjuvant therapy.
From the Second Department of Surgery, Shimane Medical University, Shimane, Japan.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Clinicopathologic Features of Superficial Esophageal Cancer: Results of Consecutive 100 Patients
Tachibana et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:104-116.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical Significance of the Loss of KiSS-1 and Orphan G-Protein-Coupled Receptor (hOT7T175) Gene Expression in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Ikeguchi et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:1379-1383.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Spontaneous Apoptosis in Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma: Its Relation to Fas Expression
Shibakita et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2000;6:4755-4759.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prognostic Significance of Fas and Fas Ligand Expressions in Human Esophageal Cancer
Shibakita et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 1999;5:2464-2469.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|