You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 1, January 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Impairment of Cardiac Performance by Laparoscopy in Patients Receiving Positive End-Expiratory Pressure

Eric J. Kraut, MD; John T. Anderson, MD; Amira Safwat, MD; Ronald Barbosa, BS; Bruce M. Wolfe, MD

Arch Surg. 1999;134:76-80.

Background  The cardiopulmonary effects of the combination of abdominal and thoracic pressures in humans have not been well delineated.

Objective  To study the cardiopulmonary effects of 15 mm Hg of intra-abdominal pressure in the presence and absence of 10 cm H2O of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).

Design  Prospective.

Setting  University hospital.

Methods  Nine patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy had pulmonary compliance, cardiac output, exhaled carbon dioxide, and preload (left ventricular end-diastolic volume) determined at 4 points while undergoing ventilation with (1) no PEEP before pneumoperitoneum; (2) 10 cm H2O of PEEP and no pneumoperitoneum; (3) no PEEP and 15 mm Hg of pneumoperitoneum; and (4) 10 cm H2O of PEEP and 15 mm Hg of pneumoperitoneum. Preload and cardiac output were determined by means of transesophageal echocardiography. Pulmonary compliance and exhaled carbon dioxide were determined by an attachment to the end of the endotracheal tube.

Main Outcome Measures  Preload, cardiac output, exhaled carbon dioxide, and pulmonary compliance.

Results  There was no significant change from baseline in preload, cardiac output, or pulmonary compliance when either PEEP or pneumoperitoneum was applied separately. However, there was a significant decrease in preload (P<.01), cardiac output (P=.01), and exhaled carbon dioxide (P=.04) when PEEP and pneumoperitoneum were applied together. Pulmonary compliance was not significantly affected at any of these points.

Conclusions  There was a significant reduction in preload and cardiac output when there was intra-abdominal pressure of 15 mm Hg in the presence of 10 cm H2O of PEEP. This combination of pressures may pose a contraindication to laparoscopic surgery.


From the Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Laparoscopic Exposure in Obese High-Risk Patients With Mechanical Displacement of the Abdominal Wall
Stany et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:383-386.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.