This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (56)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Endocrine Surgery  • Blood/ Coagulation  • Alert me on articles by topic

Adrian Park, MD; Michael Marcaccio, MD; Marion Sternbach, MD; Donald Witzke, PhD; Peter Fitzgerald, MD

Arch Surg. 1999;134:1263-1269.

Hypothesis  Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) provides health benefits to patients compared with open splenectomy (OS) in terms of perioperative morbidity, complications, and patient recuperation.

Design  Prospective operative and outcome data of LS patients were compared with those of OS patients (historical controls).

Setting  Data were gathered, and patients were evaluated and treated at 2 McMaster University teaching hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, and at the University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, also a teaching hospital.

Patients  From January 1, 1994, through October 31, 1998, a total of 210 patients were studied. Of them, 147 patients from 3 university teaching hospitals underwent LS. These patients were matched with 63 OS patients according to age, sex, spleen weight, indication for splenectomy, and preoperative morbidity score.

Interventions  A total of 147 patients evaluated for elective splenectomy underwent LS.

Main Outcome Measures  Spleen weight, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, perioperative complications, and cost.

Results  No significant difference in mean spleen weight was found between groups. Mean operative time was significantly longer for LS, but intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower. Mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly lower and perioperative complications significantly fewer for LS patients. Mean cost for LS with no complications was slightly lower than for OS.

Conclusions  Compared with OS, the lateral approach to LS takes longer to perform but results in reduced blood loss, shorter postoperative stay, and fewer complications. Mean weighted cost of LS is lower than OS at the study institutions. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing these techniques is planned.

From the Departments of Surgery and Pathology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington (Drs Park and Witzke); and Department of Surgery, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation (Drs Marcaccio and Fitzgerald), and Department of Medicine, St Joseph Hospital, McMaster University (Dr Sternbach), Hamilton, Ontario.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Minimal Access Cancer Management
Greene et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:130-146.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trends in Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly
Grahn et al.
Arch Surg 2006;141:755-762.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Minimally invasive surgery
Jaffray
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005;90:537-542.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laparoscopic Splenectomy: What Barriers Remain?
Weiss et al.
SURG INNOV 2005;12:23-29.
ABSTRACT  

Complications of Laparoscopic Splenectomy
Targarona et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:1137-1140.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT