You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 12, December 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Surgical Infections
 •Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Waiting for Microbiologic Data to Direct Therapy Against Nosocomial Infections in Febrile Surgical Patients

Are Outcomes Worsened?

Shawn J. Pelletier, MD; Traves D. Crabtree, MD; Thomas G. Gleason, MD; Lauren E. Banas; Shefali R. Patel, BS; Timothy L. Pruett, MD; Robert G. Sawyer, MD

Arch Surg. 1999;134:1300-1308.

Hypothesis  Allowing adequate time for laboratory and culture results before initial treatment may be associated with a worse outcome in nosocomial infections.

Design  Cohort study of all episodes of nosocomial infection from December 10, 1996, to October 28, 1998.

Setting  Surgical services at a university hospital.

Patients and Methods  In surgical patients presenting with fever, 372 episodes of nosocomial infection were evaluated. Nosocomial infections were divided by time from fever to intervention (<=12, 13-24, and >24 hours). These groups were subdivided by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores into low (<=10 [n = 114]), moderate (11-20 [n = 169]), and high severity of illness (>20 [n = 89]). Pneumonia and bloodstream infections were divided by APACHE II scores into low (<=15 [n = 55 and n = 56, respectively]) or high severity of illness (>15 [n = 84 and n = 77, respectively]).

Main Outcome Measures  Mortality, length of stay.

Results  No difference in outcome was seen between different time intervals from fever to intervention for nosocomial infections in patients with APACHE II scores of no more than 10. Patients treated more than 24 hours after fever were significantly younger than those treated at no more than 12 and 13 to 24 hours with APACHE II scores of 11 to 20 (P<.05) and more than 20 (P<.05). Mortality and length of stay for patients treated at later time intervals were comparable with those of patients treated earlier with similar APACHE II scores. There was no difference in outcome for patients with pneumonia or bloodstream infection.

Conclusions  Episodes of infection in which treatment was withheld until initial microbiologic data were available (24 hours) did not have worse outcomes compared with those treated earlier. Waiting for laboratory and culture results to direct antibiotic therapy for nosocomial infections does not appear harmful and may be potentially beneficial.


From the Surgical Infectious Disease Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.