This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (11)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Dermatology  • Melanoma  • Surgical Oncology  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Yoram Hemo, MD; Mordechai Gutman, MD; Joseph M. Klausner, MD

Arch Surg. 1999;134:148-150.

Background  The prognosis of melanoma is correlated to the stage of the primary lesion. Tumor site has also been implicated, with locations such as the trunk carrying a worse prognosis than others (such as limbs).

Hypothesis  To determine if tumor thickness correlates with location in a nonvisible body area.

Design and Setting  Retrospective medical record review of all patients with stage I melanoma treated in our medical center between 1986 and 1994. Demographic data as well as primary tumor characteristics were recorded.

Methods  The skin's surface was divided into occult and exposed areas. Exposed indicated visible to the patient during routine activities; occult areas included posterior aspect of the neck, back, posterior aspect of the thigh, calf, and plantar region. Data were analyzed for significance using the ² test.

Results  Of the 178 patients with stage I melanoma analyzed, 51.1% had limb, 35.9% trunk, and 12.9% head and neck lesions. Depth of invasion was less than 0.76 mm in 32.6%, 0.76 to 1.5 mm in 25.2%, and more than 4 mm in 7.9%. In 87 patients the tumor occurred in occult areas and in 91 patients in exposed areas. Comparing the depth of invasion in these 2 groups disclosed that thin (<0.76 mm) melanomas occurred in 20.7% of occult areas compared with 44% of exposed areas (P<.05). Deeper melanomas (>2.50 mm) occurred in 28.7% of occult areas compared with 12.1% of exposed areas (P<.05).

Conclusions  Tumors in less-visible body areas are significantly thicker at the time of diagnosis than those occurring in more highly visible areas. Delayed detection may be responsible for this finding.

From the Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Head and Neck Melanoma in the Sentinel Lymph Node Era
Agnese et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:1121-1124.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of Sentinel Lymphadenectomy in Thin Invasive Cutaneous Melanomas
Bleicher et al.
JCO 2003;21:1326-1331.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Demographic Predictors of Melanoma Stage at Diagnosis
Van Durme et al.
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:606-611.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT