This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (39)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery  • Dysphagia  • Gastrointestinal Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic

A Follow-up Study

Tuomo K. Rantanen, MD; Jarmo A. Salo, MD; Jukka T. Salminen, MD; Ilmo H. Kellokumpu, MD

Arch Surg. 1999;134:240-244.

Objective  To compare the results of open and laparoscopic fundoplication.

Design  Nonrandomized controlled study with a 3-year follow-up.

Patients and Methods  Fifty-seven consecutive patients with erosive reflux esophagitis underwent laparoscopic (30 patients) or open (27 patients) fundoplication.

Interventions  Interview by an independent person. In addition, 52 patients (91%) underwent postoperative endoscopy, and 38 patients (67%) underwent esophageal 24-hour pH recording.

Results  Temporary dysphagia was reported by 20 patients (67%) after laparoscopic and by 11 (41%) after open fundoplication (P=.05). There were no differences between groups concerning incidence of persistent dysphagia (20% vs 18%, respectively) and mild to no reflux symptoms (97% vs 100%, respectively). In addition, bloating (50% vs 63%, respectively) and increased flatus (77% vs 78%, respectively) were equally common. Visual analog scale scores for dysphagia, bloating, and increased flatus were 0.6, 2.4, and 4.3, respectively, in the laparoscopic and 0.6, 3.5, and 3.4, respectively, in the open groups. Normal belching ability was reported by 12 patients (40%) after laparoscopic and by 20 (74%) after open fundoplication (P=.01). Visick grade 1 or 2 was reported by 21 patients (70%) after laparoscopic and by 24 (89%) after open fundoplication (P=.08). Defective fundic wrap was detected in 4 patients (13%) in the laparoscopic and in none in the open group. In addition, abnormal results of 24-hour pH recording were found in 4 patients (22%) after laparoscopic and in 2 (10.5%) after open fundoplication.

Conclusion  From a functional point of view, both techniques were equally effective except concerning belching ability and temporary dysphagia.

From the Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is the Use of a Bougie Necessary for Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication?
Novitsky et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:402-406.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Significance of Esophageal Histologic Findings After Antireflux Surgery
Rantanen et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:733-736.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT