You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 4, April 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Liver Transplantation
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Distal Splenorenal Shunt

Role, Indications, and Utility in the Era of Liver Transplantation

Roger L. Jenkins, MD; Roberto Gedaly, MD; James J. Pomposelli, MD, PhD; Elizabeth A. Pomfret, MD, PhD; Fredric Gordon, MD; W. David Lewis, MD

Arch Surg. 1999;134:416-420.

Hypothesis  The distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) continues to play an important role in the management of recurrent variceal bleeding with minimal negative impact on subsequent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Design  Case-control study.

Setting  Hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation unit in a tertiary referral medical center.

Patients  From August 1, 1985, through October 31, 1997, a single team of surgeons performed 81 DSRS procedures for recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Eleven patients undergoing OLT subsequent to DSRS were compared with a group of 274 patients undergoing OLT without any previous shunt during the same period.

Main Outcome Measures  Operative time, use of blood products, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and survival rates.

Results  Operative (30-day) mortality for DSRS was 6% (n=5). From follow-up information available for 74 patients, the 1- and 5-year survival rates were 86.4% (n=64) and 74.3% (n=55), respectively. Recurrent variceal bleeding and hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 5 (6.8%) and 11 patients (14.9%), respectively, after DSRS. In 9 patients, DSRS was used as salvage for failed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Conclusions  Distal splenorenal shunt is a safe, durable, and effective treatment for controlling recurrent variceal hemorrhage in patients with acceptable operative risk and good liver function. It does not compromise future liver transplantation and can considerably delay the time until transplantation is required. Given the early occlusion rate and need for constant surveillance, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting should be reserved for patients with Child C classification cirrhosis with chronic hemorrhage or intractable ascites or as an emergency procedure for patients with uncontrollable bleeding using endoscopic therapy.


From the Division of Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Invited Critique: Distal Splenorenal Shunt
J. Michael Henderson
Arch Surg. 1999;134(4):420.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Distal Splenorenal Shunt: Preferred Treatment for Recurrent Variceal Hemorrhage in the Patient With Well-Compensated Cirrhosis
Elwood et al.
Arch Surg 2006;141:385-388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splenorenal Shunt: An Ideal Procedure in the Pacific
Wong et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:1125-1129.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Liver Transplantation With Renoportal Anastomosis After Distal Splenorenal Shunt
Kato et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:1401-1404.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.